PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
L.TO vs. AVAV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

L.TO vs. AVAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) and AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

L.TO is traded in CAD, while AVAV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AVAV values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, L.TO achieves a 2.62% return, which is significantly higher than AVAV's -35.25% return. Over the past 10 years, L.TO has outperformed AVAV with an annualized return of 26.65%, while AVAV has yielded a comparatively lower 18.94% annualized return.


L.TO

1D
-1.11%
1M
3.42%
YTD
2.62%
6M
2.89%
1Y
15.10%
3Y*
34.35%
5Y*
33.11%
10Y*
26.65%

AVAV

1D
-10.31%
1M
-10.63%
YTD
-35.25%
6M
-39.10%
1Y
-17.42%
3Y*
21.54%
5Y*
9.37%
10Y*
18.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

L.TO vs. AVAV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
L.TO
Loblaw Companies Limited
2.62%34.69%54.55%13.67%21.98%76.92%1.32%17.76%51.51%4.10%
AVAV
AeroVironment, Inc.
-35.25%50.01%32.43%43.64%46.85%-28.65%37.41%-12.88%31.17%95.15%

Correlation

The correlation between L.TO and AVAV is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2007

0.08

The correlation between L.TO and AVAV shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

L.TO:

CA$74.67B

AVAV:

$7.38B

EPS

L.TO:

CA$3.72

AVAV:

-$4.63

PS Ratio

L.TO:

0.73

AVAV:

6.15

PB Ratio

L.TO:

6.85

AVAV:

1.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

L.TO:

CA$64.25B

AVAV:

$1.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

L.TO:

CA$19.91B

AVAV:

$104.63M

EBITDA (TTM)

L.TO:

CA$7.21B

AVAV:

-$242.06M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

L.TO vs. AVAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

L.TO
L.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
L.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
L.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
L.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
L.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
L.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

AVAV
AVAV Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
AVAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVAV Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
AVAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVAV Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

L.TO vs. AVAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) and AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


L.TOAVAVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.02

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

-0.28

+1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.43

-0.48

+2.92

L.TO vs. AVAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current L.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is higher than the AVAV Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of L.TO and AVAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

L.TO vs. AVAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum L.TO drawdown since its inception was -44.67%, smaller than the maximum AVAV drawdown of -63.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for L.TO and AVAV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


L.TOAVAVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.67%

-63.60%

+18.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.53%

-62.61%

+48.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.53%

-62.61%

+48.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.53%

-62.61%

+48.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.54%

-62.61%

+44.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.06%

-62.61%

+54.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.05%

-31.59%

+24.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.22%

36.02%

-29.80%

Volatility

L.TO vs. AVAV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) is 6.47%, while AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) has a volatility of 28.92%. This indicates that L.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


L.TOAVAVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.47%

28.92%

-22.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.19%

59.36%

-43.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.21%

75.62%

-54.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.94%

56.50%

-37.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.39%

52.52%

-32.13%

Dividends

L.TO vs. AVAV - Dividend Comparison

L.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, while AVAV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVAV
AeroVironment, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
L.TO
Loblaw Companies Limited
0.91%2.19%4.20%5.43%5.28%5.40%8.15%7.40%6.45%7.84%7.27%7.61%

Financials

L.TO vs. AVAV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Loblaw Companies Limited and AeroVironment, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
14.48B
-10.80M
(L.TO) Total Revenue
(AVAV) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. L.TO values in CAD, AVAV values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


L.TO and AVAV have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for L.TO and AVAV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer