KYN vs. CSUIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund (KYN) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX).
KYN is an actively managed fund by Kayne Anderson. It was launched on Sep 28, 2024. CSUIX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on May 2, 2004.
Performance
KYN vs. CSUIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
KYN vs. CSUIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KYN Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund | 17.57% | 5.34% | 60.45% | 13.19% | 20.50% | 44.21% | -51.60% | 11.52% | -19.35% | 7.33% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 8.44% | 14.69% | 8.74% | 2.46% | -4.89% | 16.60% | -1.29% | 24.72% | -5.52% | 18.15% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KYN achieves a 17.57% return, which is significantly higher than CSUIX's 8.44% return. Over the past 10 years, KYN has outperformed CSUIX with an annualized return of 9.00%, while CSUIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.83% annualized return.
KYN
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 17.57%
- 6M
- 20.05%
- 1Y
- 20.40%
- 3Y*
- 29.59%
- 5Y*
- 24.40%
- 10Y*
- 9.00%
CSUIX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 6M
- 9.16%
- 1Y
- 18.40%
- 3Y*
- 11.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 7.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KYN vs. CSUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
KYN has a 2.00% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUIX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
KYN vs. CSUIX — Risk / Return Rank
KYN
CSUIX
KYN vs. CSUIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund (KYN) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KYN | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.92 | 1.67 | -0.75 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | 2.21 | -0.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.33 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | 2.42 | -1.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.27 | 10.58 | -6.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KYN | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 1.67 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | 0.64 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.53 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.58 | -0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between KYN and CSUIX is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
KYN vs. CSUIX - Dividend Comparison
KYN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%, less than CSUIX's 7.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KYN Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund | 6.83% | 7.75% | 8.34% | 9.45% | 9.05% | 6.42% | 16.17% | 10.34% | 14.17% | 9.97% | 11.24% | 15.20% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 7.76% | 8.41% | 2.58% | 2.53% | 3.91% | 3.25% | 1.64% | 1.83% | 2.45% | 5.12% | 2.35% | 6.52% |
Drawdowns
KYN vs. CSUIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KYN drawdown since its inception was -91.43%, which is greater than CSUIX's maximum drawdown of -52.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KYN and CSUIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KYN | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.43% | -52.01% | -39.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.25% | -7.99% | -11.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.65% | -20.01% | -1.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.74% | -35.01% | -52.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -4.36% | +3.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.15% | -8.21% | -18.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.58% | 1.82% | +2.76% |
Volatility
KYN vs. CSUIX - Volatility Comparison
Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund (KYN) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) at 3.24%. This indicates that KYN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KYN | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.20% | 3.24% | +0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.79% | 6.90% | +5.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.28% | 11.49% | +10.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.50% | 12.86% | +10.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.12% | 14.88% | +26.24% |