KYLD vs. XRMI
KYLD (Kurv High Income ETF) and XRMI (Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. KYLD is actively managed, while XRMI is passively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KYLD charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XRMI.
Performance
KYLD vs. XRMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KYLD achieves a 18.37% return, which is significantly higher than XRMI's 1.75% return.
KYLD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 10.94%
- YTD
- 18.37%
- 6M
- 13.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRMI
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 1.75%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- 1Y
- 9.48%
- 3Y*
- 6.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KYLD vs. XRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KYLD Kurv High Income ETF | 18.37% | -10.91% |
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF | 1.75% | 2.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between KYLD and XRMI is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2025 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KYLD vs. XRMI — Risk / Return Rank
KYLD
XRMI
KYLD vs. XRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv High Income ETF (KYLD) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KYLD | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.37 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
KYLD vs. XRMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KYLD drawdown since its inception was -20.69%, which is greater than XRMI's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KYLD and XRMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KYLD | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.69% | -15.31% | -5.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.20% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.57% | -5.94% | -2.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.23% | — |
Volatility
KYLD vs. XRMI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KYLD | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.89% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.21% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.84% | 5.39% | +27.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.84% | 6.91% | +25.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.84% | 6.91% | +25.93% |
KYLD vs. XRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
KYLD has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than XRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
KYLD vs. XRMI - Dividend Comparison
KYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.05%, more than XRMI's 12.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KYLD Kurv High Income ETF | 17.05% | 6.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF | 12.62% | 12.35% | 11.86% | 12.62% | 12.84% | 2.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KYLD and XRMI have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRMI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRMI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for KYLD.
KYLD has the higher dividend yield at 17.05%, compared with 12.62% for XRMI.
They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for KYLD and 0.60% for XRMI.
Find the right allocation for KYLD and XRMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer