KXS.TO vs. AAPL
Compare and contrast key facts about Kinaxis Inc. (KXS.TO) and Apple Inc (AAPL).
Performance
KXS.TO vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
KXS.TO vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KXS.TO Kinaxis Inc. | -18.86% | -0.03% | 16.43% | -2.11% | -14.33% | -1.67% | 80.30% | 51.78% | -14.18% | 22.86% |
AAPL Apple Inc | -4.69% | 4.05% | 41.93% | 45.73% | -21.16% | 33.43% | 79.23% | 79.67% | 2.63% | 39.01% |
Different Trading Currencies
KXS.TO is traded in CAD, while AAPL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AAPL values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
KXS.TO:
CA$4.03B
AAPL:
$3.79T
KXS.TO:
CA$2.46
AAPL:
$7.89
KXS.TO:
57.14
AAPL:
32.39
KXS.TO:
0.00
AAPL:
4.26
KXS.TO:
7.37
AAPL:
8.76
KXS.TO:
9.57
AAPL:
42.93
KXS.TO:
CA$548.57M
AAPL:
$435.62B
KXS.TO:
CA$343.27M
AAPL:
$206.16B
KXS.TO:
CA$106.80M
AAPL:
$150.07B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KXS.TO achieves a -18.86% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's -5.30% return. Over the past 10 years, KXS.TO has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 12.19%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 26.97% annualized return.
KXS.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 8.86%
- YTD
- -18.86%
- 6M
- -21.55%
- 1Y
- -10.30%
- 3Y*
- -8.87%
- 5Y*
- -2.10%
- 10Y*
- 12.19%
AAPL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.49%
- YTD
- -5.30%
- 6M
- -0.66%
- 1Y
- 11.05%
- 3Y*
- 17.12%
- 5Y*
- 18.62%
- 10Y*
- 26.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KXS.TO vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank
KXS.TO
AAPL
KXS.TO vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinaxis Inc. (KXS.TO) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KXS.TO | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | 0.35 | -0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | 0.73 | -1.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.11 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 0.48 | -0.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.61 | 1.19 | -1.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KXS.TO | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.35 | 0.35 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 | 0.71 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.97 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 1.10 | -0.49 |
Correlation
The correlation between KXS.TO and AAPL is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
KXS.TO vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison
KXS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KXS.TO Kinaxis Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.41% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
Drawdowns
KXS.TO vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KXS.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.17%, which is greater than AAPL's maximum drawdown of -40.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KXS.TO and AAPL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KXS.TO | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.17% | -81.80% | +33.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.04% | -22.99% | -20.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.17% | -33.36% | -14.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.17% | -38.52% | -9.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.70% | -10.59% | -28.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.95% | -29.71% | +11.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.81% | 7.41% | +11.40% |
Volatility
KXS.TO vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison
Kinaxis Inc. (KXS.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.12% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 5.37%. This indicates that KXS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KXS.TO | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.12% | 5.37% | +5.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.41% | 15.55% | +7.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.31% | 31.47% | -2.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.95% | 26.33% | +7.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.18% | 27.87% | +8.31% |
Financials
KXS.TO vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kinaxis Inc. and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KXS.TO vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison
KXS.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kinaxis Inc. reported a gross profit of 89.64M and revenue of 146.45M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.2%.
AAPL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 69.23B and revenue of 143.76B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.2%.
KXS.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kinaxis Inc. reported an operating income of 24.15M and revenue of 146.45M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.
AAPL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 50.85B and revenue of 143.76B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.4%.
KXS.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kinaxis Inc. reported a net income of 19.80M and revenue of 146.45M, resulting in a net margin of 13.5%.
AAPL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 42.10B and revenue of 143.76B, resulting in a net margin of 29.3%.