KXI vs. IWM
KXI (iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KXI is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Consumer Staples Index, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, KXI returned 5.53%/yr vs 10.93%/yr for IWM. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KXI charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.
Performance
KXI vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KXI achieves a 3.26% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 17.07% return. Over the past 10 years, KXI has underperformed IWM with an annualized return of 5.53%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.93% annualized return.
KXI
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -1.82%
- YTD
- 3.26%
- 6M
- 2.93%
- 1Y
- 1.68%
- 3Y*
- 5.80%
- 5Y*
- 3.75%
- 10Y*
- 5.53%
IWM
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- YTD
- 17.07%
- 6M
- 15.83%
- 1Y
- 39.10%
- 3Y*
- 17.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.11%
- 10Y*
- 10.93%
KXI vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KXI iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF | 3.26% | 9.68% | 4.20% | 2.41% | -6.02% | 13.71% | 7.69% | 23.40% | -10.71% | 17.60% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 17.07% | 12.66% | 11.38% | 16.83% | -20.48% | 14.54% | 20.03% | 25.39% | -11.12% | 14.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between KXI and IWM is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2006 | 0.58 |
Over the past year, the correlation between KXI and IWM has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
KXI vs. IWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KXI
IWM
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
KXI
IWM
Consumer Cyclical
KXI
IWM
Basic Materials
KXI
-
IWM
Communication Services
KXI
-
IWM
Energy
KXI
-
IWM
Financial Services
KXI
-
IWM
Healthcare
KXI
-
IWM
Industrials
KXI
-
IWM
Real Estate
KXI
-
IWM
Technology
KXI
-
IWM
Utilities
KXI
-
IWM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KXI vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
KXI
IWM
KXI vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF (KXI) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KXI | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.34 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | 3.56 | -3.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.37 | 12.64 | -12.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KXI | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 | 2.05 | -1.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.27 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.48 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.37 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
KXI vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KXI drawdown since its inception was -42.27%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KXI and IWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KXI | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.27% | -59.05% | +16.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.24% | -11.03% | +0.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.92% | -27.50% | +15.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.45% | -31.91% | +14.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.59% | -41.13% | +16.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.24% | -1.49% | -7.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.36% | -10.77% | +5.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.62% | 3.10% | +1.52% |
Volatility
KXI vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF (KXI) is 3.90%, while iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a volatility of 5.75%. This indicates that KXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KXI | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.90% | 5.75% | -1.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.33% | 13.53% | -4.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.78% | 19.20% | -7.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.45% | 22.52% | -10.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.74% | 23.04% | -9.30% |
KXI vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
KXI has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
KXI vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
KXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, more than IWM's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0.88% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
KXI iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF | 2.22% | 2.29% | 2.51% | 2.99% | 1.98% | 2.26% | 2.34% | 2.17% | 2.97% | 2.17% | 2.34% | 2.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KXI and IWM have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWM has higher volatility (5.75%) compared to KXI (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KXI dropped -42.27% vs IWM's -59.05%.
On 10-year performance, IWM leads with 10.93% vs 5.53% for KXI. On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, KXI has been the lower-risk option at 3.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWM has performed better with a 10.93% return vs 5.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for KXI.
KXI has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 0.88% for IWM.
KXI is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. KXI tracks S&P Global Consumer Staples Index, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for KXI and 0.19% for IWM.
IWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KXI and IWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer