PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KXI vs. ACWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KXI vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF (KXI) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KXI achieves a 5.81% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 9.86% return. Over the past 10 years, KXI has underperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 6.05%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively higher 13.09% annualized return.


KXI

1D
1.64%
1M
-0.89%
YTD
5.81%
6M
6.12%
1Y
5.44%
3Y*
6.40%
5Y*
4.58%
10Y*
6.05%

ACWI

1D
-2.00%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
9.86%
6M
9.11%
1Y
25.60%
3Y*
20.00%
5Y*
10.74%
10Y*
13.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KXI vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KXI
iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF
5.81%9.68%4.20%2.41%-6.02%13.71%7.69%23.40%-10.71%17.60%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
9.86%22.41%17.45%22.27%-18.39%18.66%16.34%26.59%-9.19%24.33%

Correlation

The correlation between KXI and ACWI is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2008

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between KXI and ACWI has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

KXI vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KXI
ACWI

Consumer Defensive

97.0%
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

3.0%
8.6%

Basic Materials

-

3.6%

Communication Services

-

8.0%

Energy

-

3.6%

Financial Services

-

15.9%

Healthcare

-

7.7%

Industrials

-

10.3%

Real Estate

-

1.6%

Technology

-

33.0%

Utilities

-

2.7%

Consumer Defensive

KXI
97.0%
ACWI
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

KXI
3.0%
ACWI
8.6%

Basic Materials

KXI

-

ACWI
3.6%

Communication Services

KXI

-

ACWI
8.0%

Energy

KXI

-

ACWI
3.6%

Financial Services

KXI

-

ACWI
15.9%

Healthcare

KXI

-

ACWI
7.7%

Industrials

KXI

-

ACWI
10.3%

Real Estate

KXI

-

ACWI
1.6%

Technology

KXI

-

ACWI
33.0%

Utilities

KXI

-

ACWI
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KXI vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KXI
KXI Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
KXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
KXI Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
KXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
KXI Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KXI vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF (KXI) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KXIACWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.34

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.53

2.64

-2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.12

11.51

-10.39

KXI vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KXI Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KXI and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KXI vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KXI drawdown since its inception was -42.27%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KXI and ACWI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KXIACWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.27%

-56.00%

+13.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.24%

-9.73%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.92%

-16.55%

+4.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.45%

-26.42%

+8.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.59%

-33.53%

+8.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.00%

-2.83%

-4.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.37%

-8.59%

+3.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.87%

2.23%

+2.64%

Volatility

KXI vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF (KXI) is 4.56%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a volatility of 5.57%. This indicates that KXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KXIACWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

5.57%

-1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.87%

11.38%

-1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.14%

13.64%

-1.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.51%

16.20%

-3.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.72%

17.08%

-3.36%

KXI vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

KXI has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

KXI vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

KXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than ACWI's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
1.45%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%
KXI
iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF
2.37%2.29%2.51%2.99%1.98%2.26%2.34%2.17%2.97%2.17%2.34%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


KXI and ACWI have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACWI has higher volatility (5.57%) compared to KXI (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KXI dropped -42.27% vs ACWI's -56.00%.

On 10-year performance, ACWI leads with 13.09% vs 6.05% for KXI. On fees, ACWI is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, KXI has been the lower-risk option at 4.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 13.09% return vs 6.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ACWI is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for KXI.

KXI has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 1.45% for ACWI.

KXI is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while ACWI is Global Equities. KXI tracks S&P Global Consumer Staples Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for KXI and 0.32% for ACWI.

ACWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KXI and ACWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer