KWEB vs. INDA
KWEB (KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF) and INDA (iShares MSCI India ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KWEB is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI Overseas China Internet Index, while INDA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI India Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, KWEB returned 0.12%/yr vs 7.09%/yr for INDA. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KWEB charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for INDA.
Performance
KWEB vs. INDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KWEB achieves a -22.20% return, which is significantly lower than INDA's -10.58% return. Over the past 10 years, KWEB has underperformed INDA with an annualized return of 0.12%, while INDA has yielded a comparatively higher 7.09% annualized return.
KWEB
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -9.28%
- YTD
- -22.20%
- 6M
- -23.82%
- 1Y
- -17.34%
- 3Y*
- 1.28%
- 5Y*
- -14.40%
- 10Y*
- 0.12%
INDA
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- -10.58%
- 6M
- -9.05%
- 1Y
- -10.57%
- 3Y*
- 4.51%
- 5Y*
- 2.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.09%
KWEB vs. INDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | -22.20% | 23.55% | 12.01% | -9.06% | -17.24% | -49.01% | 58.23% | 29.92% | -33.80% | 69.73% |
INDA iShares MSCI India ETF | -10.58% | 2.68% | 8.63% | 17.16% | -8.94% | 21.36% | 14.83% | 6.49% | -6.67% | 36.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between KWEB and INDA is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2013 | 0.40 |
The correlation between KWEB and INDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (3 years) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
KWEB vs. INDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KWEB
INDA
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Healthcare
Real Estate
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
KWEB
INDA
Communication Services
KWEB
INDA
Technology
KWEB
INDA
Healthcare
KWEB
INDA
Real Estate
KWEB
INDA
Industrials
KWEB
INDA
Consumer Defensive
KWEB
INDA
Financial Services
KWEB
INDA
Basic Materials
KWEB
-
INDA
Energy
KWEB
-
INDA
Utilities
KWEB
-
INDA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KWEB vs. INDA — Risk / Return Rank
KWEB
INDA
KWEB vs. INDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KWEB | INDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.88 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | -0.63 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.09 | -1.46 | +0.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KWEB vs. INDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KWEB drawdown since its inception was -80.92%, which is greater than INDA's maximum drawdown of -45.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KWEB and INDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KWEB | INDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.92% | -45.07% | -35.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.46% | -18.69% | -16.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.46% | -22.72% | -12.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.17% | -22.72% | -49.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.92% | -45.07% | -35.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.36% | -17.77% | -51.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.30% | -9.59% | -25.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.80% | 8.09% | +9.71% |
Volatility
KWEB vs. INDA - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) has a higher volatility of 9.39% compared to iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) at 4.16%. This indicates that KWEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KWEB | INDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.39% | 4.16% | +5.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.21% | 12.77% | +7.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.20% | 14.79% | +12.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.66% | 15.40% | +32.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.98% | 21.11% | +18.87% |
KWEB vs. INDA - Expense Ratio Comparison
KWEB has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than INDA's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
KWEB vs. INDA - Dividend Comparison
KWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.91%, while INDA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDA iShares MSCI India ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.76% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 6.44% | 0.27% | 0.99% | 0.94% | 1.09% | 0.90% | 1.19% |
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | 7.91% | 6.16% | 3.51% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 7.07% | 0.29% | 0.08% | 3.40% | 0.58% | 1.19% | 0.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KWEB and INDA have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KWEB has higher volatility (9.39%) compared to INDA (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KWEB dropped -80.92% vs INDA's -45.07%.
On 10-year performance, INDA leads with 7.09% vs 0.12% for KWEB. On fees, INDA is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, INDA has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, INDA has performed better with a 7.09% return vs 0.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INDA is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for KWEB.
KWEB has the higher dividend yield at 7.91%, compared with 0.00% for INDA.
KWEB is categorized as China Equities, while INDA is Asia Pacific Equities. KWEB tracks CSI Overseas China Internet Index, while INDA tracks MSCI India Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for KWEB and 0.69% for INDA.
KWEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.71 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KWEB and INDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer