KWEB vs. FXP
KWEB (KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF) and FXP (ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50) are both exchange-traded funds - KWEB is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI Overseas China Internet Index, while FXP is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, KWEB returned -0.63%/yr vs -21.73%/yr for FXP. At a correlation of -0.80, they often move in opposite directions. KWEB charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FXP.
Performance
KWEB vs. FXP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KWEB achieves a -30.60% return, which is significantly lower than FXP's 41.49% return. Over the past 10 years, KWEB has outperformed FXP with an annualized return of -0.63%, while FXP has yielded a comparatively lower -21.73% annualized return.
KWEB
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- -13.32%
- YTD
- -30.60%
- 6M
- -31.53%
- 1Y
- -27.19%
- 3Y*
- -0.64%
- 5Y*
- -16.73%
- 10Y*
- -0.63%
FXP
- 1D
- 5.21%
- 1M
- 25.84%
- YTD
- 41.49%
- 6M
- 43.45%
- 1Y
- 28.98%
- 3Y*
- -25.26%
- 5Y*
- -12.36%
- 10Y*
- -21.73%
KWEB vs. FXP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | -30.60% | 23.55% | 12.01% | -9.06% | -17.24% | -49.01% | 58.23% | 29.92% | -33.80% | 69.73% |
FXP ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 | 41.49% | -45.32% | -52.46% | 12.74% | -11.73% | 23.56% | -39.47% | -29.01% | 12.45% | -49.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between KWEB and FXP is -0.90, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2013 | -0.80 |
The correlation between KWEB and FXP shifts across timeframes, from -0.93 (5 years) to -0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KWEB vs. FXP — Risk / Return Rank
KWEB
FXP
KWEB vs. FXP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KWEB | FXP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.15 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | 1.18 | -1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | 2.07 | -3.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KWEB vs. FXP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KWEB drawdown since its inception was -80.92%, smaller than the maximum FXP drawdown of -99.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KWEB and FXP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KWEB | FXP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.92% | -99.94% | +19.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.62% | -24.73% | -16.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.62% | -82.34% | +40.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.17% | -87.85% | +15.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.92% | -94.44% | +13.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.67% | -99.90% | +27.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.39% | -94.15% | +58.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.04% | 14.07% | +4.97% |
Volatility
KWEB vs. FXP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) is 8.14%, while ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) has a volatility of 12.89%. This indicates that KWEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KWEB | FXP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.14% | 12.89% | -4.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.56% | 29.92% | -9.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.10% | 39.64% | -12.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.70% | 63.24% | -15.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.00% | 54.79% | -14.79% |
KWEB vs. FXP - Expense Ratio Comparison
KWEB has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than FXP's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
KWEB vs. FXP - Dividend Comparison
KWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.87%, more than FXP's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXP ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 | 2.54% | 9.57% | 3.55% | 2.20% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 1.20% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | 8.87% | 6.16% | 3.51% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 7.07% | 0.29% | 0.08% | 3.40% | 0.58% | 1.19% | 0.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KWEB and FXP have a correlation of -0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXP has higher volatility (12.89%) compared to KWEB (8.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KWEB dropped -80.92% vs FXP's -99.94%.
On 10-year performance, KWEB leads with -0.63% vs -21.73% for FXP. On fees, KWEB is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, KWEB has been the lower-risk option at 8.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, KWEB has performed better with a -0.63% return vs -21.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KWEB is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FXP.
KWEB has the higher dividend yield at 8.87%, compared with 2.54% for FXP.
KWEB is categorized as China Equities, while FXP is Leveraged Equities. KWEB tracks CSI Overseas China Internet Index, while FXP tracks FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-200%). They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for KWEB and 0.95% for FXP.
FXP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KWEB and FXP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer