KVLE vs. CSTK
KVLE (KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF) and CSTK (Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. KVLE is passively managed, while CSTK is actively managed. Over the past year, KVLE returned 18.85% vs 26.71% for CSTK. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KVLE charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CSTK.
Performance
KVLE vs. CSTK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KVLE achieves a 10.22% return, which is significantly lower than CSTK's 11.29% return.
KVLE
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- 10.22%
- 6M
- 9.55%
- 1Y
- 18.85%
- 3Y*
- 14.93%
- 5Y*
- 9.67%
- 10Y*
- —
CSTK
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- 11.29%
- 6M
- 13.04%
- 1Y
- 26.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KVLE vs. CSTK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KVLE KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF | 10.22% | 13.43% |
CSTK Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF | 11.29% | 18.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between KVLE and CSTK is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2025 | 0.82 |
The correlation between KVLE and CSTK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KVLE vs. CSTK — Risk / Return Rank
KVLE
CSTK
KVLE vs. CSTK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF (KVLE) and Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF (CSTK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KVLE | CSTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.42 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 3.02 | -1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.57 | 11.85 | -4.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KVLE | CSTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | 2.38 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 2.54 | -1.66 |
Drawdowns
KVLE vs. CSTK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KVLE drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, which is greater than CSTK's maximum drawdown of -8.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KVLE and CSTK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KVLE | CSTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.38% | -8.87% | -9.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.59% | -8.87% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | -0.60% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.21% | -1.28% | -1.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 2.26% | +0.24% |
Volatility
KVLE vs. CSTK - Volatility Comparison
KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF (KVLE) and Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF (CSTK) have volatilities of 2.64% and 2.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KVLE | CSTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | 2.68% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.35% | 8.45% | -0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.04% | 11.28% | -0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 11.60% | +2.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.33% | 11.60% | +2.73% |
KVLE vs. CSTK - Expense Ratio Comparison
KVLE has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than CSTK's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
KVLE vs. CSTK - Dividend Comparison
KVLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.30%, more than CSTK's 1.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSTK Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF | 1.77% | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KVLE KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF | 7.30% | 7.90% | 7.99% | 2.53% | 5.78% | 9.51% | 0.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KVLE and CSTK have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSTK has higher volatility (2.68%) compared to KVLE (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KVLE dropped -18.38% vs CSTK's -8.87%.
On 1-year performance, CSTK leads with 26.71% vs 18.85% for KVLE. On fees, CSTK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CSTK has performed better with a 26.71% return vs 18.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSTK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for KVLE.
KVLE has the higher dividend yield at 7.30%, compared with 1.77% for CSTK.
They also come from different issuers: CICC and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for KVLE and 0.35% for CSTK.
CSTK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KVLE and CSTK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer