KTEC vs. ISVBF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KTEC (KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF) and ISVBF (iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF) are both China Equities funds - KTEC tracks the Hang Seng Tech Index while ISVBF tracks the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, KTEC returned 7.14%/yr vs 9.94%/yr for ISVBF. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KTEC charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for ISVBF.

Performance

KTEC vs. ISVBF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) and iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (ISVBF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KTEC achieves a -11.17% return, which is significantly lower than ISVBF's -6.46% return.

KTEC

• 1D: -3.20%
• 1M: -0.29%
• YTD: -11.17%
• 6M: -12.80%
• 1Y: -8.17%
• 3Y*: 7.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ISVBF

• 1D: -2.03%
• 1M: -2.58%
• YTD: -6.46%
• 6M: -7.93%
• 1Y: 7.29%
• 3Y*: 9.94%
• 5Y*: -5.16%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KTEC vs. ISVBF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF	-11.17%	21.01%	16.13%	-10.41%	-26.12%	-29.50%
ISVBF iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF	-6.46%	30.64%	18.96%	-9.28%	-23.01%	-23.28%

Correlation

The correlation between KTEC and ISVBF is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2021	0.33

Over the past year, KTEC and ISVBF have become more correlated (0.66) than their long-term average of 0.33, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

KTEC vs. ISVBF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KTEC

KTEC Risk / Return Rank: 6
KTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
KTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
KTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 6
KTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
KTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 6

ISVBF

ISVBF Risk / Return Rank: 13
ISVBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
ISVBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
ISVBF Omega Ratio Rank: 13
ISVBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
ISVBF Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KTEC vs. ISVBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) and iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (ISVBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KTEC	ISVBF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.29	0.24	-0.53
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.24	0.54	-0.78
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.07	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.28	0.38	-0.66
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.50	0.89	-1.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KTEC vs. ISVBF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KTEC Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the ISVBF Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KTEC and ISVBF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KTEC	ISVBF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.29	0.24	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.24	-0.15	-0.09

Drawdowns

KTEC vs. ISVBF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KTEC drawdown since its inception was -66.90%, which is greater than ISVBF's maximum drawdown of -53.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KTEC and ISVBF.

Drawdown Indicators

	KTEC	ISVBF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.90%	-53.78%	-13.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.36%	-19.18%	-10.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.71%	-23.77%	-10.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-53.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.95%	-24.18%	-19.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.97%	-32.76%	-11.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.26%	8.21%	+8.05%

Volatility

KTEC vs. ISVBF - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) and iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (ISVBF) have volatilities of 10.62% and 10.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KTEC	ISVBF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.62%	10.81%	-0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.56%	26.55%	-5.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.01%	30.57%	-2.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.22%	30.20%	+13.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.22%	30.21%	+13.01%

KTEC vs. ISVBF - Expense Ratio Comparison

KTEC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than ISVBF's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

KTEC vs. ISVBF - Dividend Comparison

KTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, while ISVBF has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ISVBF iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF	3.78%	3.36%	0.27%	0.81%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KTEC and ISVBF in my portfolio?

KTEC and ISVBF have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KTEC or ISVBF?

ISVBF has higher volatility (10.81%) compared to KTEC (10.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KTEC dropped -66.90% vs ISVBF's -53.78%.

Which ETF is better, KTEC or ISVBF?

On 3-year performance, ISVBF leads with 9.94% vs 7.14% for KTEC. On fees, ISVBF is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, KTEC has been the lower-risk option at 10.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KTEC or ISVBF?

Over the 3-year period, ISVBF has performed better with a 9.94% return vs 7.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KTEC or ISVBF?

ISVBF is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for KTEC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KTEC or ISVBF?

KTEC has the higher dividend yield at 3.78%, compared with 0.00% for ISVBF.

What is the main difference between KTEC and ISVBF?

KTEC tracks Hang Seng Tech Index, while ISVBF tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for KTEC and 0.40% for ISVBF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ISVBF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.