KTEC vs. DRGN
KTEC (KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF) and DRGN (Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KTEC is a China Equities fund tracking the Hang Seng Tech Index, while DRGN is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BITA China Generative AI Select Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KTEC charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for DRGN.
Performance
KTEC vs. DRGN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KTEC achieves a -11.17% return, which is significantly lower than DRGN's 16.07% return.
KTEC
- 1D
- -3.20%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- -11.17%
- 6M
- -12.80%
- 1Y
- -8.17%
- 3Y*
- 7.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRGN
- 1D
- 3.59%
- 1M
- 4.57%
- YTD
- 16.07%
- 6M
- 17.38%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KTEC vs. DRGN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF | -11.17% | -2.30% |
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF | 16.07% | 26.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between KTEC and DRGN is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KTEC vs. DRGN — Risk / Return Rank
KTEC
DRGN
KTEC vs. DRGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) and Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KTEC | DRGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.50 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KTEC | DRGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.24 | 1.56 | -1.80 |
Drawdowns
KTEC vs. DRGN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KTEC drawdown since its inception was -66.90%, which is greater than DRGN's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KTEC and DRGN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KTEC | DRGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.90% | -20.86% | -46.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.95% | -7.44% | -36.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.97% | -7.94% | -36.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.26% | — | — |
Volatility
KTEC vs. DRGN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KTEC | DRGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.62% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.56% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.01% | 34.93% | -6.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.22% | 34.93% | +8.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.22% | 34.93% | +8.29% |
KTEC vs. DRGN - Expense Ratio Comparison
KTEC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than DRGN's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
KTEC vs. DRGN - Dividend Comparison
KTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, more than DRGN's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF | 1.05% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF | 3.78% | 3.36% | 0.27% | 0.81% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KTEC and DRGN have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DRGN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRGN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for KTEC.
KTEC has the higher dividend yield at 3.78%, compared with 1.05% for DRGN.
KTEC is categorized as China Equities, while DRGN is Technology Equities. KTEC tracks Hang Seng Tech Index, while DRGN tracks BITA China Generative AI Select Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for KTEC and 0.39% for DRGN.
Find the right allocation for KTEC and DRGN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer