KTEC vs. DRGN
KTEC (KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF) and DRGN (Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both China Equities funds - KTEC tracks the Hang Seng Tech Index while DRGN tracks the BITA China Generative AI Select Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KTEC charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for DRGN.
Performance
KTEC vs. DRGN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KTEC achieves a -17.62% return, which is significantly lower than DRGN's 13.24% return.
KTEC
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- 6M
- -25.13%
- YTD
- -17.62%
- 1Y
- -15.81%
- 3Y*
- 1.41%
- 5Y*
- -10.84%
- 10Y*
- —
DRGN
- 1D
- -4.05%
- 1M
- 4.96%
- 6M
- -2.23%
- YTD
- 13.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KTEC vs. DRGN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF | -17.62% | 0.55% |
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF | 13.24% | 26.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between KTEC and DRGN is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KTEC vs. DRGN — Risk / Return Rank
KTEC
DRGN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KTEC vs. DRGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) and Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KTEC | DRGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.82 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KTEC vs. DRGN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KTEC drawdown since its inception was -66.90%, which is greater than DRGN's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KTEC and DRGN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KTEC | DRGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.90% | -20.86% | -46.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.02% | -9.69% | -38.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.03% | -8.16% | -35.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.26% | — | — |
Volatility
KTEC vs. DRGN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KTEC | DRGN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.94% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.53% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.05% | 35.86% | -7.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.14% | 35.86% | +7.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.89% | 35.86% | +7.03% |
KTEC vs. DRGN - Expense Ratio Comparison
KTEC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than DRGN's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
KTEC vs. DRGN - Dividend Comparison
KTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, more than DRGN's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF | 1.07% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF | 4.07% | 3.36% | 0.27% | 0.81% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KTEC and DRGN have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DRGN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRGN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for KTEC.
KTEC has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 1.07% for DRGN.
KTEC tracks Hang Seng Tech Index, while DRGN tracks BITA China Generative AI Select Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for KTEC and 0.39% for DRGN.
Find the right allocation for KTEC and DRGN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer