KTEC vs. CWEB
KTEC (KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF) and CWEB (Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares) are both China Equities funds - KTEC tracks the Hang Seng Tech Index while CWEB tracks the CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KTEC returned -10.84%/yr vs -42.28%/yr for CWEB. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KTEC charges 0.69%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for CWEB.
Performance
KTEC vs. CWEB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KTEC achieves a -17.62% return, which is significantly higher than CWEB's -45.40% return.
KTEC
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- 6M
- -25.13%
- YTD
- -17.62%
- 1Y
- -15.81%
- 3Y*
- 1.41%
- 5Y*
- -10.84%
- 10Y*
- —
CWEB
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- -3.29%
- 6M
- -54.85%
- YTD
- -45.40%
- 1Y
- -41.53%
- 3Y*
- -16.96%
- 5Y*
- -42.28%
- 10Y*
- —
KTEC vs. CWEB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF | -17.62% | 21.01% | 16.13% | -10.41% | -26.12% | -29.98% |
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | -45.40% | 29.04% | 0.12% | -32.85% | -59.43% | -72.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between KTEC and CWEB is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2021 | 0.94 |
The correlation between KTEC and CWEB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
KTEC vs. CWEB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KTEC
CWEB
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
-
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
KTEC
CWEB
Technology
KTEC
CWEB
Communication Services
KTEC
CWEB
Industrials
KTEC
CWEB
-
Healthcare
KTEC
CWEB
Basic Materials
KTEC
-
CWEB
-
Consumer Defensive
KTEC
-
CWEB
Energy
KTEC
-
CWEB
-
Financial Services
KTEC
-
CWEB
Real Estate
KTEC
-
CWEB
Utilities
KTEC
-
CWEB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KTEC vs. CWEB — Risk / Return Rank
KTEC
CWEB
KTEC vs. CWEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) and Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KTEC | CWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 0.89 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | -0.60 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.82 | -1.10 | +0.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KTEC vs. CWEB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KTEC drawdown since its inception was -66.90%, smaller than the maximum CWEB drawdown of -98.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KTEC and CWEB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KTEC | CWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.90% | -98.18% | +31.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.49% | -69.36% | +32.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.49% | -69.36% | +32.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.03% | -94.78% | +30.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.02% | -97.78% | +49.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.03% | -65.82% | +21.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.26% | 37.85% | -18.59% |
Volatility
KTEC vs. CWEB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) is 6.94%, while Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) has a volatility of 15.57%. This indicates that KTEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KTEC | CWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.94% | 15.57% | -8.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.53% | 41.03% | -20.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.05% | 55.12% | -27.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.14% | 94.34% | -51.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.89% | 80.43% | -37.54% |
KTEC vs. CWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
KTEC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than CWEB's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
KTEC vs. CWEB - Dividend Comparison
KTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, less than CWEB's 6.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | 6.65% | 2.77% | 4.59% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.64% | 1.59% | 2.98% |
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF | 4.07% | 3.36% | 0.27% | 0.81% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, KTEC and CWEB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CWEB has higher volatility (15.57%) compared to KTEC (6.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KTEC dropped -66.90% vs CWEB's -98.18%.
On 5-year performance, KTEC leads with -10.84% vs -42.28% for CWEB. On fees, KTEC is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, KTEC has been the lower-risk option at 6.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, KTEC has performed better with a -10.84% return vs -42.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KTEC is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CWEB.
CWEB has the higher dividend yield at 6.65%, compared with 4.07% for KTEC.
KTEC tracks Hang Seng Tech Index, while CWEB tracks CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for KTEC and 1.30% for CWEB.
KTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.57 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KTEC and CWEB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer