PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KTEC vs. CHAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KTEC vs. CHAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) and Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KTEC achieves a -11.17% return, which is significantly lower than CHAU's 17.74% return.


KTEC

1D
-3.20%
1M
-0.29%
YTD
-11.17%
6M
-12.80%
1Y
-8.17%
3Y*
7.14%
5Y*
10Y*

CHAU

1D
-0.12%
1M
5.21%
YTD
17.74%
6M
25.00%
1Y
80.30%
3Y*
12.95%
5Y*
-9.67%
10Y*
4.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KTEC vs. CHAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
KTEC
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF
-11.17%21.01%16.13%-10.41%-26.12%-29.50%
CHAU
Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares
17.74%47.73%6.61%-28.25%-49.17%-8.58%

Correlation

The correlation between KTEC and CHAU is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2021

0.68

The correlation between KTEC and CHAU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

KTEC vs. CHAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KTEC
CHAU

Consumer Cyclical

48.6%
6.7%

Communication Services

27.6%
0.8%

Technology

21.3%
26.3%

Healthcare

2.5%
4.9%

Basic Materials

-

10.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.3%

Energy

-

2.7%

Financial Services

-

20.4%

Industrials

-

16.7%

Real Estate

-

0.5%

Utilities

-

3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

KTEC
48.6%
CHAU
6.7%

Communication Services

KTEC
27.6%
CHAU
0.8%

Technology

KTEC
21.3%
CHAU
26.3%

Healthcare

KTEC
2.5%
CHAU
4.9%

Basic Materials

KTEC

-

CHAU
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

KTEC

-

CHAU
7.3%

Energy

KTEC

-

CHAU
2.7%

Financial Services

KTEC

-

CHAU
20.4%

Industrials

KTEC

-

CHAU
16.7%

Real Estate

KTEC

-

CHAU
0.5%

Utilities

KTEC

-

CHAU
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KTEC vs. CHAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KTEC
KTEC Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
KTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
KTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
KTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
KTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

CHAU
CHAU Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
CHAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHAU Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
CHAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHAU Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KTEC vs. CHAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) and Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KTECCHAUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.29

2.42

-2.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.24

3.05

-3.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.39

-0.42

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.28

5.29

-5.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.50

15.85

-16.36

KTEC vs. CHAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KTEC Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the CHAU Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KTEC and CHAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KTECCHAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

2.42

-2.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.24

-0.07

-0.17

Drawdowns

KTEC vs. CHAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KTEC drawdown since its inception was -66.90%, smaller than the maximum CHAU drawdown of -79.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KTEC and CHAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KTECCHAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.90%

-79.21%

+12.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.36%

-15.27%

-14.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.71%

-59.88%

+25.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.95%

-52.49%

+8.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.97%

-58.90%

+14.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.26%

5.08%

+11.18%

Volatility

KTEC vs. CHAU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) is 10.62%, while Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU) has a volatility of 11.70%. This indicates that KTEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KTECCHAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.62%

11.70%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.56%

22.78%

-2.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.01%

33.37%

-5.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.22%

47.08%

-3.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.22%

47.14%

-3.92%

KTEC vs. CHAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

KTEC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than CHAU's 1.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

KTEC vs. CHAU - Dividend Comparison

KTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, more than CHAU's 1.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CHAU
Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares
1.73%1.97%2.25%3.97%0.77%1.73%0.09%0.58%0.83%
KTEC
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF
3.78%3.36%0.27%0.81%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KTEC and CHAU have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHAU has higher volatility (11.70%) compared to KTEC (10.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KTEC dropped -66.90% vs CHAU's -79.21%.

On 3-year performance, CHAU leads with 12.95% vs 7.14% for KTEC. On fees, KTEC is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, KTEC has been the lower-risk option at 10.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CHAU has performed better with a 12.95% return vs 7.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KTEC is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for CHAU.

KTEC has the higher dividend yield at 3.78%, compared with 1.73% for CHAU.

KTEC is categorized as China Equities, while CHAU is Leveraged Equities. KTEC tracks Hang Seng Tech Index, while CHAU tracks CSI 300 Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for KTEC and 1.21% for CHAU.

CHAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KTEC and CHAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer