KTEC vs. CHAU
KTEC (KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF) and CHAU (Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - KTEC is a China Equities fund tracking the Hang Seng Tech Index, while CHAU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the CSI 300 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, KTEC returned 7.14%/yr vs 12.95%/yr for CHAU. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KTEC charges 0.69%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for CHAU.
Performance
KTEC vs. CHAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KTEC achieves a -11.17% return, which is significantly lower than CHAU's 17.74% return.
KTEC
- 1D
- -3.20%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- -11.17%
- 6M
- -12.80%
- 1Y
- -8.17%
- 3Y*
- 7.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHAU
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 5.21%
- YTD
- 17.74%
- 6M
- 25.00%
- 1Y
- 80.30%
- 3Y*
- 12.95%
- 5Y*
- -9.67%
- 10Y*
- 4.54%
KTEC vs. CHAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF | -11.17% | 21.01% | 16.13% | -10.41% | -26.12% | -29.50% |
CHAU Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares | 17.74% | 47.73% | 6.61% | -28.25% | -49.17% | -8.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between KTEC and CHAU is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2021 | 0.68 |
The correlation between KTEC and CHAU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
KTEC vs. CHAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KTEC
CHAU
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
KTEC
CHAU
Communication Services
KTEC
CHAU
Technology
KTEC
CHAU
Healthcare
KTEC
CHAU
Basic Materials
KTEC
-
CHAU
Consumer Defensive
KTEC
-
CHAU
Energy
KTEC
-
CHAU
Financial Services
KTEC
-
CHAU
Industrials
KTEC
-
CHAU
Real Estate
KTEC
-
CHAU
Utilities
KTEC
-
CHAU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KTEC vs. CHAU — Risk / Return Rank
KTEC
CHAU
KTEC vs. CHAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) and Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KTEC | CHAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | 2.42 | -2.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | 3.05 | -3.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.39 | -0.42 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | 5.29 | -5.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.50 | 15.85 | -16.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KTEC | CHAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.29 | 2.42 | -2.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.24 | -0.07 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
KTEC vs. CHAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KTEC drawdown since its inception was -66.90%, smaller than the maximum CHAU drawdown of -79.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KTEC and CHAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KTEC | CHAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.90% | -79.21% | +12.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.36% | -15.27% | -14.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.71% | -59.88% | +25.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -78.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.95% | -52.49% | +8.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.97% | -58.90% | +14.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.26% | 5.08% | +11.18% |
Volatility
KTEC vs. CHAU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) is 10.62%, while Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU) has a volatility of 11.70%. This indicates that KTEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KTEC | CHAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.62% | 11.70% | -1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.56% | 22.78% | -2.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.01% | 33.37% | -5.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.22% | 47.08% | -3.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.22% | 47.14% | -3.92% |
KTEC vs. CHAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
KTEC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than CHAU's 1.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
KTEC vs. CHAU - Dividend Comparison
KTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, more than CHAU's 1.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHAU Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares | 1.73% | 1.97% | 2.25% | 3.97% | 0.77% | 1.73% | 0.09% | 0.58% | 0.83% |
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF | 3.78% | 3.36% | 0.27% | 0.81% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KTEC and CHAU have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHAU has higher volatility (11.70%) compared to KTEC (10.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KTEC dropped -66.90% vs CHAU's -79.21%.
On 3-year performance, CHAU leads with 12.95% vs 7.14% for KTEC. On fees, KTEC is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, KTEC has been the lower-risk option at 10.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CHAU has performed better with a 12.95% return vs 7.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KTEC is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for CHAU.
KTEC has the higher dividend yield at 3.78%, compared with 1.73% for CHAU.
KTEC is categorized as China Equities, while CHAU is Leveraged Equities. KTEC tracks Hang Seng Tech Index, while CHAU tracks CSI 300 Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for KTEC and 1.21% for CHAU.
CHAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KTEC and CHAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer