KTCAX vs. SCQGX
Compare and contrast key facts about DWS Science and Technology Fund (KTCAX) and DWS Large Cap Focus Growth Fund (SCQGX).
KTCAX is managed by DWS. It was launched on Sep 6, 1948. SCQGX is managed by DWS. It was launched on May 15, 1991.
Performance
KTCAX vs. SCQGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
KTCAX vs. SCQGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KTCAX DWS Science and Technology Fund | -12.14% | 21.21% | 40.51% | 57.73% | -36.66% | 22.68% | 46.12% | 42.35% | -1.03% | 35.79% |
SCQGX DWS Large Cap Focus Growth Fund | -14.30% | 15.68% | 29.47% | 41.14% | -33.56% | 23.59% | 40.77% | 37.33% | -1.92% | 25.13% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KTCAX achieves a -12.14% return, which is significantly higher than SCQGX's -14.30% return. Over the past 10 years, KTCAX has outperformed SCQGX with an annualized return of 18.81%, while SCQGX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.05% annualized return.
KTCAX
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- -9.00%
- YTD
- -12.14%
- 6M
- -10.67%
- 1Y
- 21.18%
- 3Y*
- 25.10%
- 5Y*
- 12.33%
- 10Y*
- 18.81%
SCQGX
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -9.94%
- YTD
- -14.30%
- 6M
- -12.85%
- 1Y
- 10.34%
- 3Y*
- 16.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.28%
- 10Y*
- 14.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KTCAX vs. SCQGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
KTCAX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than SCQGX's 0.83% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
KTCAX vs. SCQGX — Risk / Return Rank
KTCAX
SCQGX
KTCAX vs. SCQGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Science and Technology Fund (KTCAX) and DWS Large Cap Focus Growth Fund (SCQGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KTCAX | SCQGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 0.46 | +0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.34 | 0.83 | +0.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.11 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | 0.37 | +0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.79 | 1.34 | +1.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KTCAX | SCQGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 0.46 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.38 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | 0.67 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.45 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between KTCAX and SCQGX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
KTCAX vs. SCQGX - Dividend Comparison
KTCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.47%, less than SCQGX's 18.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KTCAX DWS Science and Technology Fund | 9.47% | 8.32% | 10.15% | 11.73% | 6.31% | 10.93% | 7.36% | 8.99% | 14.35% | 4.50% | 2.32% | 11.97% |
SCQGX DWS Large Cap Focus Growth Fund | 18.12% | 15.53% | 8.91% | 1.75% | 4.85% | 8.53% | 4.11% | 5.59% | 6.16% | 3.68% | 7.44% | 15.37% |
Drawdowns
KTCAX vs. SCQGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KTCAX drawdown since its inception was -82.20%, which is greater than SCQGX's maximum drawdown of -64.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KTCAX and SCQGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KTCAX | SCQGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.20% | -64.09% | -18.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.60% | -17.77% | +1.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.37% | -37.69% | -4.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.37% | -37.69% | -4.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.60% | -17.77% | +1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.98% | -19.29% | -8.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.93% | 4.95% | -0.02% |
Volatility
KTCAX vs. SCQGX - Volatility Comparison
DWS Science and Technology Fund (KTCAX) has a higher volatility of 7.13% compared to DWS Large Cap Focus Growth Fund (SCQGX) at 6.01%. This indicates that KTCAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCQGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KTCAX | SCQGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.13% | 6.01% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.91% | 13.03% | +2.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.62% | 22.54% | +3.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.82% | 21.94% | +2.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.92% | 20.95% | +2.97% |