PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KT vs. OVCHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KT vs. OVCHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KT Corporation (KT) and Overseas Chinese Banking Corp Ltd ADR (OVCHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KT achieves a -0.64% return, which is significantly lower than OVCHY's 21.10% return. Over the past 10 years, KT has underperformed OVCHY with an annualized return of 5.93%, while OVCHY has yielded a comparatively higher 17.14% annualized return.


KT

1D
1.19%
1M
-11.76%
YTD
-0.64%
6M
2.50%
1Y
-3.10%
3Y*
22.56%
5Y*
10.32%
10Y*
5.93%

OVCHY

1D
-1.27%
1M
4.32%
YTD
21.10%
6M
30.73%
1Y
52.46%
3Y*
33.96%
5Y*
20.56%
10Y*
17.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KT vs. OVCHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KT
KT Corporation
-0.64%27.73%19.93%5.01%13.34%21.00%-5.09%-18.42%-8.90%10.79%
OVCHY
Overseas Chinese Banking Corp Ltd ADR
21.10%33.93%33.06%15.54%11.75%14.29%-1.22%1.15%-8.35%59.34%

Correlation

The correlation between KT and OVCHY is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2010

0.20

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KT:

$10.39B

OVCHY:

$82.88B

EPS

KT:

$3.14K

OVCHY:

$4.85

PE Ratio

KT:

0.01

OVCHY:

7.53

PEG Ratio

KT:

0.00

OVCHY:

0.67

PS Ratio

KT:

0.00

OVCHY:

3.17

PB Ratio

KT:

0.00

OVCHY:

1.34

Total Revenue (TTM)

KT:

$28.39T

OVCHY:

$26.07B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KT:

$15.90T

OVCHY:

$26.07B

EBITDA (TTM)

KT:

$5.41T

OVCHY:

$13.10B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KT vs. OVCHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KT
KT Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
KT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
KT Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
KT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
KT Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

OVCHY
OVCHY Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
OVCHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OVCHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
OVCHY Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
OVCHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
OVCHY Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KT vs. OVCHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KT Corporation (KT) and Overseas Chinese Banking Corp Ltd ADR (OVCHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KTOVCHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.43

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.11

6.56

-6.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.30

17.26

-17.56

KT vs. OVCHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KT Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the OVCHY Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KT and OVCHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KTOVCHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

2.45

-2.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.87

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.69

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.48

-0.45

Drawdowns

KT vs. OVCHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KT drawdown since its inception was -85.64%, which is greater than OVCHY's maximum drawdown of -45.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KT and OVCHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KTOVCHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.64%

-45.62%

-40.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.30%

-8.04%

-19.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.30%

-17.96%

-9.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.30%

-18.37%

-8.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.03%

-45.62%

-18.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.22%

-4.40%

-43.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.89%

-9.90%

-55.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.41%

3.05%

+7.36%

Volatility

KT vs. OVCHY - Volatility Comparison

KT Corporation (KT) has a higher volatility of 7.40% compared to Overseas Chinese Banking Corp Ltd ADR (OVCHY) at 4.96%. This indicates that KT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OVCHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KTOVCHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.40%

4.96%

+2.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.83%

12.65%

+4.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.95%

21.58%

+0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.55%

23.82%

-1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.34%

25.04%

-1.70%

Dividends

KT vs. OVCHY - Dividend Comparison

KT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, less than OVCHY's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KT
KT Corporation
3.34%4.24%3.50%5.29%5.40%6.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.49%1.84%
OVCHY
Overseas Chinese Banking Corp Ltd ADR
4.21%4.78%5.25%6.07%4.55%3.35%3.79%3.83%3.08%3.93%8.07%3.64%

Financials

KT vs. OVCHY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between KT Corporation and Overseas Chinese Banking Corp Ltd ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00T4.00T6.00T8.00T20222023202420252026
6.98T
8.70B
(KT) Total Revenue
(OVCHY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KT vs. OVCHY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between KT Corporation and Overseas Chinese Banking Corp Ltd ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
32.7%
100.0%
Portfolio components
KT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KT Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.28T and revenue of 6.98T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.7%.

OVCHY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Overseas Chinese Banking Corp Ltd ADR reported a gross profit of 8.70B and revenue of 8.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

KT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KT Corporation reported an operating income of 492.09B and revenue of 6.98T, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.

OVCHY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Overseas Chinese Banking Corp Ltd ADR reported an operating income of 4.51B and revenue of 8.70B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.8%.

KT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KT Corporation reported a net income of 399.91B and revenue of 6.98T, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.

OVCHY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Overseas Chinese Banking Corp Ltd ADR reported a net income of 3.71B and revenue of 8.70B, resulting in a net margin of 42.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KT and OVCHY have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KT has higher volatility (7.40%) compared to OVCHY (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KT dropped -85.64% vs OVCHY's -45.62%.

OVCHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KT and OVCHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer