PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KT vs. AXS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KT vs. AXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KT Corporation (KT) and AXIS Capital Holdings Limited (AXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KT achieves a -1.81% return, which is significantly higher than AXS's -9.77% return. Over the past 10 years, KT has underperformed AXS with an annualized return of 5.80%, while AXS has yielded a comparatively higher 8.69% annualized return.


KT

1D
1.93%
1M
-12.80%
YTD
-1.81%
6M
0.74%
1Y
-3.46%
3Y*
22.08%
5Y*
9.85%
10Y*
5.80%

AXS

1D
-2.63%
1M
-3.20%
YTD
-9.77%
6M
-1.57%
1Y
-8.45%
3Y*
24.17%
5Y*
16.16%
10Y*
8.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KT vs. AXS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KT
KT Corporation
-1.81%27.73%19.93%5.01%13.34%21.00%-5.09%-18.42%-8.90%10.79%
AXS
AXIS Capital Holdings Limited
-9.77%22.96%63.90%5.57%2.63%11.81%-11.92%18.26%5.75%-20.96%

Correlation

The correlation between KT and AXS is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2003

0.20

The correlation between KT and AXS shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KT:

$10.26B

AXS:

$7.23B

EPS

KT:

$3.14K

AXS:

$13.77

PE Ratio

KT:

0.01

AXS:

6.99

PEG Ratio

KT:

0.00

AXS:

0.13

PS Ratio

KT:

0.00

AXS:

1.13

PB Ratio

KT:

0.00

AXS:

1.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

KT:

$28.39T

AXS:

$6.61B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KT:

$15.90T

AXS:

$3.55B

EBITDA (TTM)

KT:

$5.41T

AXS:

$2.61B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KT vs. AXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KT
KT Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
KT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
KT Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
KT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
KT Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

AXS
AXS Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
AXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
AXS Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
AXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
AXS Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KT vs. AXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KT Corporation (KT) and AXIS Capital Holdings Limited (AXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KTAXSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

0.96

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.13

-0.58

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.34

-1.27

+0.93

KT vs. AXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KT Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is higher than the AXS Sharpe Ratio of -0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KT and AXS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KTAXSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

-0.37

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.65

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.33

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.32

-0.30

Drawdowns

KT vs. AXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KT drawdown since its inception was -85.64%, which is greater than AXS's maximum drawdown of -55.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KT and AXS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KTAXSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.64%

-55.93%

-29.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.30%

-14.60%

-12.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.30%

-16.73%

-10.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.30%

-18.99%

-8.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.03%

-49.31%

-14.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.83%

-11.13%

-37.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.90%

-12.16%

-53.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.31%

7.82%

+2.49%

Volatility

KT vs. AXS - Volatility Comparison

KT Corporation (KT) and AXIS Capital Holdings Limited (AXS) have volatilities of 7.36% and 7.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KTAXSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.36%

7.08%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.79%

15.60%

+1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.96%

22.73%

-0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.55%

25.00%

-2.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.40%

26.58%

-3.18%

Dividends

KT vs. AXS - Dividend Comparison

KT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than AXS's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AXS
AXIS Capital Holdings Limited
1.83%1.64%1.99%3.18%3.19%3.10%3.27%2.71%3.04%3.04%2.19%2.17%
KT
KT Corporation
3.38%4.24%3.50%5.29%5.40%6.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.49%1.84%

Financials

KT vs. AXS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between KT Corporation and AXIS Capital Holdings Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00T4.00T6.00T8.00T20222023202420252026
6.98T
1.64B
(KT) Total Revenue
(AXS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KT vs. AXS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between KT Corporation and AXIS Capital Holdings Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
32.7%
99.9%
Portfolio components
KT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KT Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.28T and revenue of 6.98T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.7%.

AXS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AXIS Capital Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 1.64B and revenue of 1.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.9%.

KT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KT Corporation reported an operating income of 492.09B and revenue of 6.98T, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.

AXS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AXIS Capital Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 1.48B and revenue of 1.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 90.2%.

KT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KT Corporation reported a net income of 399.91B and revenue of 6.98T, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.

AXS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AXIS Capital Holdings Limited reported a net income of 254.77M and revenue of 1.64B, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KT and AXS have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KT has higher volatility (7.36%) compared to AXS (7.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KT dropped -85.64% vs AXS's -55.93%.

KT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.16 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KT and AXS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer