PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KT vs. ABX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KT vs. ABX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KT Corporation (KT) and Barrick Gold Corporation (ABX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

KT is traded in USD, while ABX.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ABX.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KT achieves a -0.64% return, which is significantly higher than ABX.TO's -9.32% return. Over the past 10 years, KT has underperformed ABX.TO with an annualized return of 5.93%, while ABX.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.36% annualized return.


KT

1D
1.19%
1M
-11.76%
YTD
-0.64%
6M
2.50%
1Y
-3.10%
3Y*
22.56%
5Y*
10.32%
10Y*
5.93%

ABX.TO

1D
-0.99%
1M
-9.18%
YTD
-9.32%
6M
-3.25%
1Y
96.99%
3Y*
35.14%
5Y*
13.99%
10Y*
9.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KT vs. ABX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KT
KT Corporation
-0.64%27.73%19.93%5.01%13.34%21.00%-5.09%-18.42%-8.90%10.79%
ABX.TO
Barrick Gold Corporation
-9.32%187.00%-12.13%8.23%-4.75%-13.94%24.68%37.48%-5.29%-8.71%

Correlation

The correlation between KT and ABX.TO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2006

0.13

The correlation between KT and ABX.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KT:

$10.39B

ABX.TO:

CA$91.34B

EPS

KT:

$3.14K

ABX.TO:

CA$3.60

PE Ratio

KT:

0.01

ABX.TO:

15.16

PEG Ratio

KT:

0.00

ABX.TO:

0.17

PS Ratio

KT:

0.00

ABX.TO:

4.86

PB Ratio

KT:

0.00

ABX.TO:

3.34

Total Revenue (TTM)

KT:

$28.39T

ABX.TO:

CA$19.02B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KT:

$15.90T

ABX.TO:

CA$10.15B

EBITDA (TTM)

KT:

$5.41T

ABX.TO:

CA$12.44B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KT vs. ABX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KT
KT Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
KT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
KT Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
KT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
KT Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

ABX.TO
ABX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ABX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ABX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KT vs. ABX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KT Corporation (KT) and Barrick Gold Corporation (ABX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KTABX.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.35

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.11

3.34

-3.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.30

8.31

-8.61

KT vs. ABX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KT Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the ABX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KT and ABX.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KTABX.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

2.18

-2.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.40

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.26

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.07

-0.04

Drawdowns

KT vs. ABX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KT drawdown since its inception was -85.64%, roughly equal to the maximum ABX.TO drawdown of -88.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KT and ABX.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KTABX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.64%

-88.57%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.30%

-29.24%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.30%

-29.24%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.30%

-46.90%

+19.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.03%

-57.25%

-6.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.22%

-25.12%

-23.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.89%

-48.13%

-17.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.41%

11.71%

-1.30%

Volatility

KT vs. ABX.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KT Corporation (KT) is 7.40%, while Barrick Gold Corporation (ABX.TO) has a volatility of 16.61%. This indicates that KT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KTABX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.40%

16.61%

-9.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.83%

34.09%

-17.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.95%

44.69%

-22.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.55%

35.29%

-12.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.34%

36.47%

-13.13%

Dividends

KT vs. ABX.TO - Dividend Comparison

KT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, more than ABX.TO's 2.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABX.TO
Barrick Gold Corporation
2.32%1.22%2.46%2.27%4.77%3.96%1.33%0.60%1.17%0.72%0.47%1.43%
KT
KT Corporation
3.34%4.24%3.50%5.29%5.40%6.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.49%1.84%

Financials

KT vs. ABX.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between KT Corporation and Barrick Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00T4.00T6.00T8.00T20222023202420252026
6.98T
5.16B
(KT) Total Revenue
(ABX.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. KT values in USD, ABX.TO values in CAD

KT vs. ABX.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between KT Corporation and Barrick Gold Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
32.7%
57.5%
Portfolio components
KT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KT Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.28T and revenue of 6.98T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.7%.

ABX.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barrick Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.97B and revenue of 5.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.5%.

KT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KT Corporation reported an operating income of 492.09B and revenue of 6.98T, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.

ABX.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barrick Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 2.93B and revenue of 5.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 56.7%.

KT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KT Corporation reported a net income of 399.91B and revenue of 6.98T, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.

ABX.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barrick Gold Corporation reported a net income of 1.58B and revenue of 5.16B, resulting in a net margin of 30.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KT and ABX.TO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KT and ABX.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer