PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KSTR vs. KCSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KSTR vs. KCSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR) and KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF (KCSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KSTR achieves a 32.94% return, which is significantly higher than KCSH's 1.49% return.


KSTR

1D
1.39%
1M
7.01%
YTD
32.94%
6M
38.23%
1Y
83.76%
3Y*
16.36%
5Y*
-0.21%
10Y*

KCSH

1D
0.02%
1M
0.32%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.83%
1Y
4.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KSTR vs. KCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KSTR and KCSH is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2024

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KSTR vs. KCSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KSTR
KSTR Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
KSTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KSTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
KSTR Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
KSTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
KSTR Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

KCSH
KCSH Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
KCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
KCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
KCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
KCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KSTR vs. KCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR) and KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF (KCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KSTRKCSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

2.16

-0.76

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.76

7.00

-2.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.06

59.08

-47.02

KSTR vs. KCSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KSTR Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the KCSH Sharpe Ratio of 3.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KSTR and KCSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KSTRKCSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

3.30

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

3.26

-3.26

Drawdowns

KSTR vs. KCSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KSTR drawdown since its inception was -66.46%, which is greater than KCSH's maximum drawdown of -0.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KSTR and KCSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KSTRKCSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.46%

-0.58%

-65.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.70%

-0.58%

-17.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.98%

0.00%

-10.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.77%

-0.03%

-38.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.97%

0.07%

+6.90%

Volatility

KSTR vs. KCSH - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR) has a higher volatility of 15.14% compared to KraneShares Sustainable Ultra Short Duration Index ETF (KCSH) at 0.06%. This indicates that KSTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KCSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KSTRKCSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.14%

0.06%

+15.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.21%

0.83%

+25.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.48%

1.24%

+34.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.31%

1.33%

+36.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.68%

1.33%

+36.35%

KSTR vs. KCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

KSTR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than KCSH's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

KSTR vs. KCSH - Dividend Comparison

KSTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KCSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KSTR and KCSH have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KSTR has higher volatility (15.14%) compared to KCSH (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KSTR dropped -66.46% vs KCSH's -0.58%.

On 1-year performance, KSTR leads with 83.76% vs 4.06% for KCSH. On fees, KCSH is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, KCSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KSTR has performed better with a 83.76% return vs 4.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KCSH is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for KSTR.

KCSH has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 0.00% for KSTR.

KSTR is categorized as China Equities, while KCSH is Ultrashort Bond. KSTR tracks SSE Science and Technology Innovation Board 50 Index, while KCSH tracks Solactive ISS Sustainable Select 0-1 Year USD Corporate IG Index. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for KSTR and 0.20% for KCSH.

KCSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KSTR and KCSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer