KSTR vs. DRAG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KSTR (KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF) and DRAG (Roundhill China Dragons ETF) are both China Equities funds. KSTR is passively managed, while DRAG is actively managed. KSTR charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for DRAG.

Performance

KSTR vs. DRAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR) and Roundhill China Dragons ETF (DRAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

KSTR

• 1D: 1.39%
• 1M: 7.01%
• YTD: 32.94%
• 6M: 38.23%
• 1Y: 83.76%
• 3Y*: 16.36%
• 5Y*: -0.21%
• 10Y*: —

DRAG

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KSTR vs. DRAG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
KSTR KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF	21.93%
DRAG Roundhill China Dragons ETF	0.00%

KSTR vs. DRAG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KSTR	DRAG
Technology	78.5%	10.2%
Industrials	6.5%	-
Healthcare	4.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	1.4%	72.4%
Energy	0.9%	-
Basic Materials	0.6%	-
Communication Services	-	17.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

KSTR vs. DRAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KSTR

KSTR Risk / Return Rank: 71
KSTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
KSTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
KSTR Omega Ratio Rank: 65
KSTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
KSTR Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KSTR vs. DRAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR) and Roundhill China Dragons ETF (DRAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KSTR	DRAG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.76	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.06	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KSTR	DRAG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.00	—	—

Drawdowns

KSTR vs. DRAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KSTR drawdown since its inception was -66.46%, which is greater than DRAG's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KSTR and DRAG.

Drawdown Indicators

	KSTR	DRAG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.46%	0.00%	-66.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.70%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.98%	0.00%	-10.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.77%	0.00%	-38.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.97%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KSTR	DRAG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.14%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.21%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.48%	0.00%	+35.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.31%	0.00%	+38.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.68%	0.00%	+37.68%

KSTR vs. DRAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

KSTR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than DRAG's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

KSTR vs. DRAG - Dividend Comparison

Neither KSTR nor DRAG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, KSTR or DRAG?

On fees, DRAG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KSTR or DRAG?

DRAG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for KSTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KSTR or DRAG?

KSTR and DRAG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between KSTR and DRAG?

They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for KSTR and 0.59% for DRAG.