PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KSOAX vs. EMCAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KSOAX vs. EMCAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kinetics Small Capital Opportunities Advisor Fund Class A (KSOAX) and Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KSOAX achieves a 17.17% return, which is significantly higher than EMCAX's 10.47% return. Over the past 10 years, KSOAX has outperformed EMCAX with an annualized return of 18.92%, while EMCAX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.68% annualized return.


KSOAX

1D
-3.20%
1M
-7.60%
YTD
17.17%
6M
16.45%
1Y
4.52%
3Y*
25.43%
5Y*
13.96%
10Y*
18.92%

EMCAX

1D
0.16%
1M
0.83%
YTD
10.47%
6M
7.91%
1Y
16.39%
3Y*
12.38%
5Y*
3.99%
10Y*
10.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KSOAX vs. EMCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KSOAX
Kinetics Small Capital Opportunities Advisor Fund Class A
17.17%-8.89%68.00%-14.98%31.64%49.94%2.04%26.72%0.00%25.94%
EMCAX
Empiric 2500 Fund
10.47%2.37%13.89%12.43%-16.06%16.07%27.81%19.10%-4.64%21.82%

Correlation

The correlation between KSOAX and EMCAX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2001

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between KSOAX and EMCAX has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KSOAX vs. EMCAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KSOAX
KSOAX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
KSOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KSOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
KSOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
KSOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
KSOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

EMCAX
EMCAX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
EMCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
EMCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KSOAX vs. EMCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinetics Small Capital Opportunities Advisor Fund Class A (KSOAX) and Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KSOAXEMCAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.17

1.15

-0.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.41

1.77

-1.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.20

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.03

1.91

-1.89

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.06

7.24

-7.18

KSOAX vs. EMCAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KSOAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the EMCAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KSOAX and EMCAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KSOAXEMCAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

1.15

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.22

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.53

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.46

+0.07

Drawdowns

KSOAX vs. EMCAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KSOAX drawdown since its inception was -70.21%, which is greater than EMCAX's maximum drawdown of -51.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KSOAX and EMCAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KSOAXEMCAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.21%

-51.81%

-18.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.84%

-8.60%

-10.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.28%

-19.19%

-14.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.28%

-30.60%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.11%

-42.79%

-4.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.84%

-3.06%

-16.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.88%

-13.27%

-2.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.21%

2.27%

+5.94%

Volatility

KSOAX vs. EMCAX - Volatility Comparison

Kinetics Small Capital Opportunities Advisor Fund Class A (KSOAX) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX) at 4.62%. This indicates that KSOAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KSOAXEMCAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.10%

4.62%

+1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.68%

11.26%

+10.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.93%

14.17%

+11.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.84%

18.17%

+9.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.13%

20.24%

+5.89%

KSOAX vs. EMCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

KSOAX has a 1.89% expense ratio, which is lower than EMCAX's 1.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

KSOAX vs. EMCAX - Dividend Comparison

KSOAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
EMCAX
Empiric 2500 Fund
0.12%0.13%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.51%7.46%
KSOAX
Kinetics Small Capital Opportunities Advisor Fund Class A
0.00%0.00%3.52%6.72%0.00%1.41%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KSOAX and EMCAX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KSOAX has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to EMCAX (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KSOAX dropped -70.21% vs EMCAX's -51.81%.

EMCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KSOAX and EMCAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer