KSLV vs. SLVP
KSLV (Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF) and SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) are both Silver funds. KSLV is actively managed, while SLVP is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KSLV charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for SLVP.
Performance
KSLV vs. SLVP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KSLV achieves a -18.01% return, which is significantly lower than SLVP's -9.42% return.
KSLV
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -11.97%
- 6M
- -27.58%
- YTD
- -18.01%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLVP
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -4.28%
- 6M
- -16.96%
- YTD
- -9.42%
- 1Y
- 68.96%
- 3Y*
- 48.69%
- 5Y*
- 16.51%
- 10Y*
- 9.28%
KSLV vs. SLVP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KSLV Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF | -18.01% | 49.94% |
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | -9.42% | 28.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between KSLV and SLVP is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KSLV vs. SLVP — Risk / Return Rank
KSLV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SLVP
KSLV vs. SLVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF (KSLV) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KSLV | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.00 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.51 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KSLV vs. SLVP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KSLV drawdown since its inception was -53.51%, smaller than the maximum SLVP drawdown of -80.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KSLV and SLVP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KSLV | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.51% | -80.47% | +26.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -38.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -38.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.41% | -34.66% | -16.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.02% | -46.71% | +23.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 16.80% | — |
Volatility
KSLV vs. SLVP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KSLV | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.82% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 45.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.51% | 55.70% | +14.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.51% | 43.45% | +27.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.51% | 42.49% | +28.02% |
KSLV vs. SLVP - Expense Ratio Comparison
KSLV has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SLVP's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
KSLV vs. SLVP - Dividend Comparison
KSLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.17%, more than SLVP's 2.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KSLV Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF | 23.17% | 4.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | 2.27% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 0.88% | 0.63% | 1.63% | 2.39% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KSLV and SLVP have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SLVP is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SLVP is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for KSLV.
KSLV has the higher dividend yield at 23.17%, compared with 2.27% for SLVP.
They also come from different issuers: Kurv and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for KSLV and 0.39% for SLVP.
Find the right allocation for KSLV and SLVP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer