KSLV vs. RBIL
KSLV (Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KSLV is a Silver fund actively managed by Kurv, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. KSLV is actively managed, while RBIL is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. KSLV charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.
Performance
KSLV vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KSLV achieves a -10.35% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.31% return.
KSLV
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -14.26%
- YTD
- -10.35%
- 6M
- -7.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RBIL
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- YTD
- 2.31%
- 6M
- 2.35%
- 1Y
- 3.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KSLV vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KSLV Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF | -10.35% | 49.94% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.31% | 0.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between KSLV and RBIL is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025 | -0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KSLV vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
KSLV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RBIL
KSLV vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF (KSLV) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KSLV | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.06 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 7.59 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 44.07 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KSLV vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KSLV drawdown since its inception was -47.97%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KSLV and RBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KSLV | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.97% | -0.52% | -47.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.86% | -0.51% | -46.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.98% | -0.07% | -20.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.09% | — |
Volatility
KSLV vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KSLV | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.36% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.85% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.70% | 0.95% | +70.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.70% | 1.07% | +70.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.70% | 1.07% | +70.63% |
KSLV vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
KSLV has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
KSLV vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
KSLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.19%, more than RBIL's 4.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
KSLV Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF | 21.19% | 4.42% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.38% | 3.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KSLV and RBIL have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for KSLV.
KSLV has the higher dividend yield at 21.19%, compared with 4.38% for RBIL.
KSLV is categorized as Silver, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and F/m. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for KSLV and 0.17% for RBIL.
Find the right allocation for KSLV and RBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer