KSLV vs. ILS

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

KSLV (Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF) and ILS (Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KSLV is a Silver fund actively managed by Kurv, while ILS is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Brookmont. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. KSLV charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.58%/yr for ILS.

Performance

KSLV vs. ILS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF (KSLV) and Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KSLV achieves a -23.62% return, which is significantly lower than ILS's 3.01% return.

KSLV

• 1D: -3.62%
• 1M: -21.06%
• 6M: -41.20%
• YTD: -23.62%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ILS

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 1.03%
• 6M: 3.07%
• YTD: 3.01%
• 1Y: 7.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KSLV vs. ILS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KSLV Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF	-23.62%	49.94%
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF	3.01%	1.76%

Correlation

The correlation between KSLV and ILS is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025	-0.01

Return for Risk

KSLV vs. ILS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KSLV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ILS

ILS Risk / Return Rank: 97
ILS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
ILS Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
ILS Omega Ratio Rank: 96
ILS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
ILS Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KSLV vs. ILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF (KSLV) and Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KSLV	ILS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.03	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	5.03	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.69	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	13.56	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	50.90	—

Drawdowns

KSLV vs. ILS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KSLV drawdown since its inception was -54.73%, which is greater than ILS's maximum drawdown of -2.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KSLV and ILS.

Drawdown Indicators

	KSLV	ILS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.73%	-2.46%	-52.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-54.73%	-0.04%	-54.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.63%	-0.52%	-23.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.15%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KSLV	ILS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.47%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.47%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.17%	2.49%	+67.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.17%	3.70%	+66.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.17%	3.70%	+66.47%

KSLV vs. ILS - Expense Ratio Comparison

KSLV has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than ILS's 1.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

KSLV vs. ILS - Dividend Comparison

KSLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.87%, more than ILS's 8.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF	8.18%	6.06%
KSLV Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF	24.87%	4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KSLV and ILS in my portfolio?

KSLV and ILS have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KSLV or ILS?

On fees, KSLV is cheaper at 1.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KSLV or ILS?

KSLV is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.58% for ILS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KSLV or ILS?

KSLV has the higher dividend yield at 24.87%, compared with 8.18% for ILS.

What is the main difference between KSLV and ILS?

KSLV is categorized as Silver, while ILS is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Brookmont. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for KSLV and 1.58% for ILS.