KSCOX vs. SMH
KSCOX (Kinetics Small Cap Opportunities Fund) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both funds - KSCOX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Kinetics, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 10 years, KSCOX returned 19.39%/yr vs 37.49%/yr for SMH. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KSCOX charges 1.64%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
KSCOX vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KSCOX achieves a 16.92% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 72.15% return. Over the past 10 years, KSCOX has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 19.39%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.49% annualized return.
KSCOX
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -1.82%
- YTD
- 16.92%
- 6M
- 17.67%
- 1Y
- 3.51%
- 3Y*
- 25.95%
- 5Y*
- 13.81%
- 10Y*
- 19.39%
SMH
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 11.44%
- YTD
- 72.15%
- 6M
- 75.62%
- 1Y
- 141.99%
- 3Y*
- 60.05%
- 5Y*
- 38.42%
- 10Y*
- 37.49%
KSCOX vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KSCOX Kinetics Small Cap Opportunities Fund | 16.92% | -8.66% | 68.42% | -14.77% | 31.96% | 50.32% | 2.30% | 27.06% | 0.29% | 26.23% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 72.15% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between KSCOX and SMH is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2000 | 0.49 |
The correlation between KSCOX and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KSCOX vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
KSCOX
SMH
KSCOX vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinetics Small Cap Opportunities Fund (KSCOX) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KSCOX | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.60 | -0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.21 | 9.18 | -8.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.47 | 33.74 | -33.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KSCOX vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KSCOX drawdown since its inception was -70.09%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KSCOX and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KSCOX | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.09% | -84.96% | +14.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.95% | -14.93% | -4.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.10% | -35.74% | +2.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.10% | -45.30% | +12.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.09% | -45.30% | -1.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.79% | -2.81% | -16.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.89% | -41.04% | +26.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.65% | 4.06% | +4.59% |
Volatility
KSCOX vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kinetics Small Cap Opportunities Fund (KSCOX) is 7.96%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 16.25%. This indicates that KSCOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KSCOX | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.96% | 16.25% | -8.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.22% | 27.73% | -5.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.51% | 33.20% | -6.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.95% | 35.47% | -7.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.18% | 32.82% | -6.64% |
KSCOX vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
KSCOX has a 1.64% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
KSCOX vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
KSCOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than SMH's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KSCOX Kinetics Small Cap Opportunities Fund | 0.15% | 0.18% | 3.58% | 6.71% | 0.00% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KSCOX and SMH have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (16.25%) compared to KSCOX (7.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KSCOX dropped -70.09% vs SMH's -84.96%.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KSCOX and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer