KSA vs. EJAN
KSA (iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF) and EJAN (Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January) are both exchange-traded funds - KSA is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Saudi Arabia IMI 25/50 Index, while EJAN is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KSA returned 1.13%/yr vs 3.53%/yr for EJAN. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. KSA charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for EJAN.
Performance
KSA vs. EJAN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KSA achieves a 3.06% return, which is significantly lower than EJAN's 6.14% return.
KSA
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.12%
- 6M
- -5.86%
- YTD
- 3.06%
- 1Y
- 1.77%
- 3Y*
- -0.88%
- 5Y*
- 1.13%
- 10Y*
- 7.99%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.02%
EJAN
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 3.18%
- YTD
- 6.14%
- 1Y
- 11.50%
- 3Y*
- 6.90%
- 5Y*
- 3.53%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $267.44K | $193.23K | $472.80K | |
| $20.82M | $19.40M | $19.77M |
KSA vs. EJAN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KSA iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF | 3.06% | -8.20% | -0.19% | 15.05% | -6.06% | 33.62% | 2.65% |
EJAN Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January | 6.14% | 14.78% | 2.69% | 5.37% | -8.01% | -1.53% | 10.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between KSA and EJAN is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020 | 0.45 |
The correlation between KSA and EJAN shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
KSA vs. EJAN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KSA
EJAN
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
KSA
EJAN
Basic Materials
KSA
EJAN
Energy
KSA
EJAN
Communication Services
KSA
EJAN
Healthcare
KSA
EJAN
Utilities
KSA
EJAN
Consumer Cyclical
KSA
EJAN
Consumer Defensive
KSA
EJAN
Industrials
KSA
EJAN
Real Estate
KSA
EJAN
Technology
KSA
EJAN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KSA vs. EJAN — Risk / Return Rank
KSA
EJAN
KSA vs. EJAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (KSA) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KSA | EJAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.29 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.10 | 1.69 | -1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.20 | 7.40 | -7.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KSA vs. EJAN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KSA drawdown since its inception was -40.56%, which is greater than EJAN's maximum drawdown of -22.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KSA and EJAN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KSA | EJAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.56% | -22.23% | -18.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.62% | -6.63% | -4.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.28% | -11.75% | -3.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.08% | -20.84% | -7.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.20% | -0.80% | -17.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.51% | -5.67% | -5.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.53% | 1.51% | +4.02% |
Volatility
KSA vs. EJAN - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (KSA) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN) have volatilities of 2.83% and 2.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KSA | EJAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.83% | 2.75% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.45% | 8.21% | +3.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.37% | 8.64% | +7.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.95% | 11.15% | +4.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.98% | 12.63% | +7.35% |
KSA vs. EJAN - Expense Ratio Comparison
KSA has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than EJAN's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
KSA vs. EJAN - Dividend Comparison
KSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, while EJAN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EJAN Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KSA iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF | 2.79% | 2.95% | 3.44% | 2.44% | 1.93% | 1.58% | 1.76% | 2.15% | 2.51% | 2.30% | 3.05% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KSA and EJAN have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KSA has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to EJAN (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KSA dropped -40.56% vs EJAN's -22.23%.
On 5-year performance, EJAN leads with 3.53% vs 1.13% for KSA. On fees, KSA is cheaper at 0.74% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EJAN has performed better with a 3.53% return vs 1.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KSA is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EJAN.
KSA has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 0.00% for EJAN.
KSA is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while EJAN is Defined Outcome. KSA tracks MSCI Saudi Arabia IMI 25/50 Index, while EJAN tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for KSA and 0.89% for EJAN.
EJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KSA and EJAN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer