KRUZ vs. AFOS
KRUZ (Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF) and AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. KRUZ charges 0.83%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AFOS.
Performance
KRUZ vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KRUZ
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AFOS
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- 3.16%
- YTD
- 33.60%
- 6M
- 31.56%
- 1Y
- 83.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KRUZ vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KRUZ Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 33.60% | 37.10% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KRUZ vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF (KRUZ) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KRUZ vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KRUZ | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -11.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -2.33% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -1.43% | — |
Volatility
KRUZ vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KRUZ | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 21.58% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 21.58% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 21.58% | — |
KRUZ vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
KRUZ has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
KRUZ vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison
KRUZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AFOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 0.22% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KRUZ Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.57% | 1.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for KRUZ.
AFOS has the higher dividend yield at 0.22%, compared with 0.00% for KRUZ.
They also come from different issuers: Subversive and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.83% for KRUZ and 0.45% for AFOS.
Find the right allocation for KRUZ and AFOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer