KRUZ vs. ^GSPC

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

KRUZ (Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Subversive, while ^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

KRUZ vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF (KRUZ) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

KRUZ

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

^GSPC

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 4.48%
• YTD: 10.79%
• 6M: 10.60%
• 1Y: 27.02%
• 3Y*: 21.07%
• 5Y*: 12.39%
• 10Y*: 13.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KRUZ vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
KRUZ Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF	0.00%	-1.31%	14.45%	10.16%
^GSPC S&P 500 Index	10.79%	16.39%	23.31%	14.55%

Correlation

The correlation between KRUZ and ^GSPC is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2023	0.67

The correlation between KRUZ and ^GSPC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

KRUZ vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^GSPC

^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 80
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 79
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KRUZ vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF (KRUZ) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KRUZ	^GSPC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.28	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.76	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.47	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	KRUZ	^GSPC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-56.78%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.10%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.90%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.43%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.33%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-10.72%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.97%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KRUZ	^GSPC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.88%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.00%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	11.89%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	16.90%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	18.06%	—

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KRUZ and ^GSPC in my portfolio?

KRUZ and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.