KROP vs. WFH

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) and Direxion Work From Home ETF (WFH).

KROP and WFH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KROP is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. It was launched on Jul 12, 2021. WFH is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the Solactive Remote Work Index. It was launched on Jun 25, 2020. Both KROP and WFH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

KROP vs. WFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) and Direxion Work From Home ETF (WFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KROP vs. WFH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	15.06%	7.95%	-8.74%	-23.86%	-27.23%	-18.75%
WFH Direxion Work From Home ETF	0.00%	15.47%	18.55%	35.75%	-45.26%	0.20%

Returns By Period

KROP

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: -4.77%
• YTD: 15.06%
• 6M: 15.34%
• 1Y: 18.33%
• 3Y*: -5.23%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WFH

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KROP vs. WFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

KROP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than WFH's 0.45% expense ratio.

KROP

Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF

WFH

Direxion Work From Home ETF

Return for Risk

KROP vs. WFH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KROP

KROP Risk / Return Rank: 51
KROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
KROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
KROP Omega Ratio Rank: 48
KROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
KROP Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KROP vs. WFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) and Direxion Work From Home ETF (WFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KROP	WFH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.41	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.78	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.21	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KROP	WFH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.60	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between KROP and WFH is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

KROP vs. WFH - Dividend Comparison

KROP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than WFH's 0.91% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	2.37%	2.73%	1.89%	1.36%	0.71%	0.69%	0.00%
WFH Direxion Work From Home ETF	0.91%	0.94%	0.50%	0.67%	0.42%	0.79%	0.86%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	KROP	WFH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.60%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.32%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.78%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KROP	WFH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.19%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.34%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.33%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.43%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.43%	—	—