KROP vs. TRUT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) and TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. KROP is passively managed, while TRUT is actively managed. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KROP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for TRUT.

Performance

KROP vs. TRUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KROP achieves a 16.34% return, which is significantly lower than TRUT's 25.30% return.

KROP

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: 16.34%
• 6M: 14.63%
• 1Y: 13.67%
• 3Y*: 0.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TRUT

• 1D: -1.46%
• 1M: 16.68%
• YTD: 25.30%
• 6M: 24.37%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KROP vs. TRUT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	16.34%	-3.86%
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF	25.30%	10.16%

Correlation

The correlation between KROP and TRUT is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025	0.05

Return for Risk

KROP vs. TRUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KROP

KROP Risk / Return Rank: 24
KROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
KROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
KROP Omega Ratio Rank: 23
KROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
KROP Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KROP vs. TRUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KROP	TRUT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.22	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.75	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KROP	TRUT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.57	2.39	-2.96

Drawdowns

KROP vs. TRUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KROP drawdown since its inception was -61.96%, which is greater than TRUT's maximum drawdown of -18.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KROP and TRUT.

Drawdown Indicators

	KROP	TRUT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.96%	-18.55%	-43.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.05%	-1.46%	-47.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.50%	-5.17%	-39.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.99%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KROP	TRUT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.77%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.01%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.04%	21.53%	-5.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.28%	21.53%	+0.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.28%	21.53%	+0.75%

KROP vs. TRUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

KROP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUT's 0.13% expense ratio.

Dividends

KROP vs. TRUT - Dividend Comparison

KROP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than TRUT's 0.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	2.35%	2.73%	1.89%	1.36%	0.71%	0.69%
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF	0.19%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KROP and TRUT in my portfolio?

KROP and TRUT have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KROP or TRUT?

On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KROP or TRUT?

TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KROP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KROP or TRUT?

KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 0.19% for TRUT.

What is the main difference between KROP and TRUT?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for KROP and 0.13% for TRUT.