KROP vs. MAGS
KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) and MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. KROP is passively managed, while MAGS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, KROP returned 0.81%/yr vs 33.71%/yr for MAGS. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KROP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for MAGS.
Performance
KROP vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KROP achieves a 16.34% return, which is significantly higher than MAGS's 3.73% return.
KROP
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 16.34%
- 6M
- 14.63%
- 1Y
- 13.67%
- 3Y*
- 0.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGS
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- 2.17%
- YTD
- 3.73%
- 6M
- 3.62%
- 1Y
- 31.34%
- 3Y*
- 33.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KROP vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF | 16.34% | 7.95% | -8.74% | -23.00% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 3.73% | 22.99% | 63.97% | 37.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between KROP and MAGS is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2023 | 0.22 |
KROP vs. MAGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KROP
MAGS
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
KROP
MAGS
-
Basic Materials
KROP
MAGS
-
Consumer Defensive
KROP
MAGS
-
Healthcare
KROP
MAGS
-
Consumer Cyclical
KROP
MAGS
Communication Services
KROP
-
MAGS
Energy
KROP
-
MAGS
-
Financial Services
KROP
-
MAGS
-
Real Estate
KROP
-
MAGS
-
Technology
KROP
-
MAGS
Utilities
KROP
-
MAGS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KROP vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank
KROP
MAGS
KROP vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KROP | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.27 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 1.69 | -0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.75 | 5.85 | -3.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KROP | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 1.57 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.57 | 1.55 | -2.12 |
Drawdowns
KROP vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KROP drawdown since its inception was -61.96%, which is greater than MAGS's maximum drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KROP and MAGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KROP | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.96% | -29.91% | -32.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.29% | -18.62% | +7.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.70% | -29.91% | +1.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.05% | -3.55% | -45.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.50% | -4.70% | -39.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.99% | 5.37% | -0.38% |
Volatility
KROP vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison
Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) have volatilities of 4.77% and 4.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KROP | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 4.80% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.01% | 14.31% | -2.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.04% | 20.08% | -4.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.28% | 25.94% | -3.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.28% | 25.94% | -3.66% |
KROP vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
KROP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
KROP vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison
KROP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than MAGS's 1.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF | 2.35% | 2.73% | 1.89% | 1.36% | 0.71% | 0.69% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.43% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KROP and MAGS have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MAGS has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to KROP (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KROP dropped -61.96% vs MAGS's -29.91%.
On 3-year performance, MAGS leads with 33.71% vs 0.81% for KROP. On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.29% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MAGS has performed better with a 33.71% return vs 0.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MAGS is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KROP.
KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 1.43% for MAGS.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for KROP and 0.29% for MAGS.
MAGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KROP and MAGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer