KROP vs. CLOD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) and CLOD (Themes Cloud Computing ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - KROP tracks the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index while CLOD tracks the Solactive Cloud Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, KROP returned 13.67% vs 2.49% for CLOD. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KROP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CLOD.

Performance

KROP vs. CLOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) and Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KROP achieves a 16.34% return, which is significantly higher than CLOD's 3.48% return.

KROP

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: 16.34%
• 6M: 14.63%
• 1Y: 13.67%
• 3Y*: 0.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLOD

• 1D: -3.72%
• 1M: 14.95%
• YTD: 3.48%
• 6M: 1.34%
• 1Y: 2.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KROP vs. CLOD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	16.34%	7.95%	-8.74%	2.42%
CLOD Themes Cloud Computing ETF	3.48%	7.53%	21.03%	0.43%

Correlation

The correlation between KROP and CLOD is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2023	0.21

The correlation between KROP and CLOD shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KROP vs. CLOD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KROP	CLOD
Industrials	39.7%	1.5%
Basic Materials	32.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	26.3%	-
Healthcare	0.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.3%	12.4%
Communication Services	-	11.7%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.3%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	75.6%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

KROP vs. CLOD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KROP

KROP Risk / Return Rank: 24
KROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
KROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
KROP Omega Ratio Rank: 23
KROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
KROP Martin Ratio Rank: 22

CLOD

CLOD Risk / Return Rank: 10
CLOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
CLOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
CLOD Omega Ratio Rank: 10
CLOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
CLOD Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KROP vs. CLOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) and Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KROP	CLOD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	0.10	+0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	0.31	+1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.04	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.22	0.08	+1.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.75	0.17	+2.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KROP vs. CLOD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KROP Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is higher than the CLOD Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KROP and CLOD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KROP	CLOD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86	0.10	+0.76
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.57	0.54	-1.11

Drawdowns

KROP vs. CLOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KROP drawdown since its inception was -61.96%, which is greater than CLOD's maximum drawdown of -31.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KROP and CLOD.

Drawdown Indicators

	KROP	CLOD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.96%	-31.36%	-30.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.29%	-31.36%	+20.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.05%	-6.61%	-42.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.50%	-7.51%	-36.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.99%	14.29%	-9.30%

Volatility

KROP vs. CLOD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) is 4.77%, while Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD) has a volatility of 10.13%. This indicates that KROP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KROP	CLOD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.77%	10.13%	-5.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.01%	21.71%	-9.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.04%	25.07%	-9.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.28%	24.46%	-2.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.28%	24.46%	-2.18%

KROP vs. CLOD - Expense Ratio Comparison

KROP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CLOD's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

KROP vs. CLOD - Dividend Comparison

KROP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than CLOD's 1.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CLOD Themes Cloud Computing ETF	1.42%	1.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	2.35%	2.73%	1.89%	1.36%	0.71%	0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KROP and CLOD in my portfolio?

KROP and CLOD have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KROP or CLOD?

CLOD has higher volatility (10.13%) compared to KROP (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KROP dropped -61.96% vs CLOD's -31.36%.

Which ETF is better, KROP or CLOD?

On 1-year performance, KROP leads with 13.67% vs 2.49% for CLOD. On fees, CLOD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, KROP has been the lower-risk option at 4.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KROP or CLOD?

Over the 1-year period, KROP has performed better with a 13.67% return vs 2.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KROP or CLOD?

CLOD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KROP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KROP or CLOD?

KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 1.42% for CLOD.

What is the main difference between KROP and CLOD?

KROP tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index, while CLOD tracks Solactive Cloud Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for KROP and 0.35% for CLOD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KROP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.