KROP.L vs. WDTE.L
KROP.L (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and WDTE.L (Invesco S&P World Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF Acc) are both Technology Equities funds - KROP.L tracks the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation v2 Index while WDTE.L tracks the S&P World ESG Enhanced Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, KROP.L returned -1.55%/yr vs 23.22%/yr for WDTE.L. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KROP.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for WDTE.L.
Performance
KROP.L vs. WDTE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KROP.L achieves a 14.38% return, which is significantly higher than WDTE.L's 8.48% return.
KROP.L
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- 6M
- 5.92%
- YTD
- 14.38%
- 1Y
- 10.47%
- 3Y*
- -1.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WDTE.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -4.11%
- 6M
- 9.36%
- YTD
- 8.48%
- 1Y
- 18.33%
- 3Y*
- 23.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KROP.L vs. WDTE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
KROP.L Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 14.38% | 7.62% | -8.33% | -22.72% |
WDTE.L Invesco S&P World Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF Acc | 8.48% | 18.89% | 34.72% | 34.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between KROP.L and WDTE.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2023 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KROP.L vs. WDTE.L — Risk / Return Rank
KROP.L
WDTE.L
KROP.L vs. WDTE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (KROP.L) and Invesco S&P World Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WDTE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KROP.L | WDTE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.16 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | 1.07 | -0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.00 | 2.84 | -0.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KROP.L vs. WDTE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KROP.L drawdown since its inception was -52.04%, which is greater than WDTE.L's maximum drawdown of -25.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KROP.L and WDTE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KROP.L | WDTE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.04% | -25.54% | -26.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.68% | -17.07% | +6.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.32% | -25.54% | -1.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.92% | -10.79% | -27.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.93% | -4.41% | -32.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.22% | 6.43% | -1.21% |
Volatility
KROP.L vs. WDTE.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X AgTech & Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (KROP.L) is 4.12%, while Invesco S&P World Information Technology ESG UCITS ETF Acc (WDTE.L) has a volatility of 7.59%. This indicates that KROP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WDTE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KROP.L | WDTE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.12% | 7.59% | -3.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.94% | 18.01% | -5.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.50% | 21.47% | -4.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.23% | 22.08% | -0.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.23% | 22.08% | -0.85% |
KROP.L vs. WDTE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
KROP.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than WDTE.L's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
KROP.L vs. WDTE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither KROP.L nor WDTE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
KROP.L and WDTE.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WDTE.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WDTE.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KROP.L.
KROP.L tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation v2 Index, while WDTE.L tracks S&P World ESG Enhanced Information Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for KROP.L and 0.18% for WDTE.L.
Find the right allocation for KROP.L and WDTE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer