KROP.DE vs. CAUT.DE
KROP.DE (Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and CAUT.DE (Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both Technology Equities funds from Global X - KROP.DE tracks the Solactive AgTech and Food Innovation while CAUT.DE tracks the Solactive China Electric Vehicle and Battery. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, KROP.DE returned -2.05%/yr vs 1.53%/yr for CAUT.DE. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KROP.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for CAUT.DE.
Performance
KROP.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KROP.DE achieves a 17.14% return, which is significantly higher than CAUT.DE's 0.51% return.
KROP.DE
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- 17.14%
- 6M
- 13.93%
- 1Y
- 9.93%
- 3Y*
- -2.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CAUT.DE
- 1D
- -2.17%
- 1M
- -14.37%
- YTD
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 4.39%
- 1Y
- 34.47%
- 3Y*
- 1.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KROP.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KROP.DE Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 17.14% | -4.87% | -2.79% | -25.11% | -19.26% |
CAUT.DE Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 0.51% | 27.42% | 9.31% | -35.25% | -25.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between KROP.DE and CAUT.DE is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KROP.DE vs. CAUT.DE — Risk / Return Rank
KROP.DE
CAUT.DE
KROP.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROP.DE) and Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (CAUT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KROP.DE | CAUT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.21 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 2.08 | -1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.21 | 4.42 | -2.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KROP.DE | CAUT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 1.18 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.47 | -0.27 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
KROP.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KROP.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.74%, smaller than the maximum CAUT.DE drawdown of -69.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KROP.DE and CAUT.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KROP.DE | CAUT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.74% | -69.24% | +16.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.22% | -15.89% | +6.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.28% | -42.32% | +15.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.08% | -43.96% | +2.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.46% | -45.53% | +9.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.34% | 7.51% | -3.17% |
Volatility
KROP.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROP.DE) is 5.58%, while Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (CAUT.DE) has a volatility of 6.05%. This indicates that KROP.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAUT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KROP.DE | CAUT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.58% | 6.05% | -0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.02% | 18.36% | -6.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.43% | 28.22% | -12.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.64% | 33.13% | -13.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.64% | 33.13% | -13.49% |
KROP.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
KROP.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CAUT.DE's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
KROP.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither KROP.DE nor CAUT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
KROP.DE and CAUT.DE have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KROP.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KROP.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for CAUT.DE.
KROP.DE tracks Solactive AgTech and Food Innovation, while CAUT.DE tracks Solactive China Electric Vehicle and Battery. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for KROP.DE and 0.68% for CAUT.DE.
Find the right allocation for KROP.DE and CAUT.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer