KROG.L vs. XFSN.L
KROG.L (Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and XFSN.L (Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C) are both Technology Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, from Global X and DWS respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, KROG.L returned -1.99%/yr vs 13.72%/yr for XFSN.L. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KROG.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XFSN.L.
Performance
KROG.L vs. XFSN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KROG.L achieves a 15.55% return, which is significantly higher than XFSN.L's -2.90% return.
KROG.L
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 15.55%
- 6M
- 13.48%
- 1Y
- 12.57%
- 3Y*
- -1.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XFSN.L
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 5.60%
- YTD
- -2.90%
- 6M
- -4.80%
- 1Y
- -1.50%
- 3Y*
- 13.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KROG.L vs. XFSN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KROG.L Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 15.55% | 0.36% | -6.89% | -26.89% | -17.53% |
XFSN.L Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C | -2.90% | 2.93% | 34.89% | 21.37% | -7.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between KROG.L and XFSN.L is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2022 | 0.44 |
Over the past year, the correlation between KROG.L and XFSN.L has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KROG.L vs. XFSN.L — Risk / Return Rank
KROG.L
XFSN.L
KROG.L vs. XFSN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFSN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KROG.L | XFSN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.00 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | -0.06 | +1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.05 | -0.13 | +3.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KROG.L | XFSN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | -0.10 | +0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.45 | 0.61 | -1.06 |
Drawdowns
KROG.L vs. XFSN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KROG.L drawdown since its inception was -51.38%, which is greater than XFSN.L's maximum drawdown of -23.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KROG.L and XFSN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KROG.L | XFSN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.38% | -23.96% | -27.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.21% | -23.96% | +15.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.00% | -23.96% | -4.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.55% | -11.60% | -26.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.39% | -6.19% | -28.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.12% | 11.38% | -7.26% |
Volatility
KROG.L vs. XFSN.L - Volatility Comparison
Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L) has a higher volatility of 5.64% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFSN.L) at 4.10%. This indicates that KROG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XFSN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KROG.L | XFSN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | 4.10% | +1.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.21% | 11.66% | +0.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.69% | 15.56% | +0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.47% | 18.54% | +0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.47% | 18.54% | +0.93% |
KROG.L vs. XFSN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
KROG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XFSN.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
KROG.L vs. XFSN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither KROG.L nor XFSN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
KROG.L and XFSN.L have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XFSN.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XFSN.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KROG.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Global X and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for KROG.L and 0.35% for XFSN.L.
Find the right allocation for KROG.L and XFSN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer