KROG.L vs. AQWG.L
KROG.L (Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and AQWG.L (Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KROG.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while AQWG.L is a Water Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Water TR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, KROG.L returned -1.99%/yr vs 7.66%/yr for AQWG.L. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
KROG.L vs. AQWG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KROG.L achieves a 15.55% return, which is significantly higher than AQWG.L's -0.99% return.
KROG.L
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 15.55%
- 6M
- 13.48%
- 1Y
- 12.57%
- 3Y*
- -1.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AQWG.L
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -1.39%
- YTD
- -0.99%
- 6M
- -3.24%
- 1Y
- 2.35%
- 3Y*
- 7.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KROG.L vs. AQWG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KROG.L Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 15.55% | 0.36% | -6.89% | -26.89% | -14.07% |
AQWG.L Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF | -0.99% | 5.17% | 7.79% | 18.26% | 5.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between KROG.L and AQWG.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022 | 0.50 |
The correlation between KROG.L and AQWG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KROG.L vs. AQWG.L — Risk / Return Rank
KROG.L
AQWG.L
KROG.L vs. AQWG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L) and Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF (AQWG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KROG.L | AQWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.04 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 0.21 | +1.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.05 | 0.52 | +2.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KROG.L | AQWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 0.18 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.45 | 0.23 | -0.68 |
Drawdowns
KROG.L vs. AQWG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KROG.L drawdown since its inception was -51.38%, which is greater than AQWG.L's maximum drawdown of -23.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KROG.L and AQWG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KROG.L | AQWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.38% | -23.03% | -28.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.21% | -11.23% | +3.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.00% | -17.73% | -10.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.55% | -9.71% | -28.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.39% | -7.35% | -27.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.12% | 4.49% | -0.37% |
Volatility
KROG.L vs. AQWG.L - Volatility Comparison
Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L) has a higher volatility of 5.64% compared to Global X Clean Water UCITS ETF (AQWG.L) at 3.98%. This indicates that KROG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AQWG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KROG.L | AQWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | 3.98% | +1.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.21% | 9.96% | +2.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.69% | 13.03% | +2.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.47% | 15.00% | +4.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.47% | 15.00% | +4.47% |
KROG.L vs. AQWG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both KROG.L and AQWG.L have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
KROG.L vs. AQWG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither KROG.L nor AQWG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
KROG.L and AQWG.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KROG.L and AQWG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
KROG.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while AQWG.L is Water Equities. KROG.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while AQWG.L tracks S&P Global Water TR.
Find the right allocation for KROG.L and AQWG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer