KRMN vs. VT
KRMN (Karman Holdings Inc.) is a stock, while VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) is Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Over the past year, KRMN returned -11.70% vs 22.85% for VT. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KRMN vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KRMN achieves a -35.15% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 11.34% return.
KRMN
- 1D
- -2.73%
- 1M
- -8.22%
- 6M
- -56.66%
- YTD
- -35.15%
- 1Y
- -11.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VT
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- 6M
- 8.37%
- YTD
- 11.34%
- 1Y
- 22.85%
- 3Y*
- 18.61%
- 5Y*
- 10.87%
- 10Y*
- 12.39%
KRMN vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KRMN Karman Holdings Inc. | -35.15% | 143.90% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 11.34% | 17.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between KRMN and VT is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KRMN vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
KRMN
VT
KRMN vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Karman Holdings Inc. (KRMN) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KRMN | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.30 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 2.37 | -2.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.41 | 10.09 | -10.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KRMN vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KRMN drawdown since its inception was -61.11%, which is greater than VT's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRMN and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KRMN | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.11% | -50.27% | -10.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.11% | -9.67% | -51.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.84% | -1.67% | -57.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.67% | -6.98% | -9.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.61% | 2.27% | +26.34% |
Volatility
KRMN vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
Karman Holdings Inc. (KRMN) has a higher volatility of 21.91% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 3.93%. This indicates that KRMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KRMN | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.91% | 3.93% | +17.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.39% | 11.49% | +45.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.75% | 13.67% | +58.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.11% | 16.20% | +52.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.11% | 17.16% | +51.95% |
Dividends
KRMN vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
KRMN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRMN Karman Holdings Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.59% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KRMN and VT have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KRMN has higher volatility (21.91%) compared to VT (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRMN dropped -61.11% vs VT's -50.27%.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KRMN and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer