KRMN vs. VT
KRMN (Karman Holdings Inc.) is a stock, while VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) is Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Over the past year, KRMN returned -7.13% vs 24.09% for VT. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KRMN vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KRMN achieves a -38.72% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 10.01% return.
KRMN
- 1D
- -3.32%
- 1M
- -30.05%
- YTD
- -38.72%
- 6M
- -44.51%
- 1Y
- -7.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VT
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.48%
- YTD
- 10.01%
- 6M
- 9.01%
- 1Y
- 24.09%
- 3Y*
- 19.90%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 12.96%
KRMN vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KRMN Karman Holdings Inc. | -38.72% | 143.90% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 10.01% | 17.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between KRMN and VT is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KRMN vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
KRMN
VT
KRMN vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Karman Holdings Inc. (KRMN) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KRMN | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.33 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | 2.50 | -2.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.29 | 10.81 | -11.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KRMN vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KRMN drawdown since its inception was -61.11%, which is greater than VT's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRMN and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KRMN | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.11% | -50.27% | -10.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.11% | -9.67% | -51.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.11% | -2.84% | -58.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.90% | -7.00% | -7.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.04% | 2.23% | +22.81% |
Volatility
KRMN vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
Karman Holdings Inc. (KRMN) has a higher volatility of 25.06% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 5.65%. This indicates that KRMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KRMN | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.06% | 5.65% | +19.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.25% | 11.29% | +46.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.53% | 13.56% | +56.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.76% | 16.19% | +52.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.76% | 17.20% | +51.56% |
Dividends
KRMN vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
KRMN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRMN Karman Holdings Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.61% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KRMN and VT have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KRMN has higher volatility (25.06%) compared to VT (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRMN dropped -61.11% vs VT's -50.27%.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KRMN and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer