PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KRE vs. COMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KRE vs. COMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KRE achieves a 21.63% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 30.19% return. Over the past 10 years, KRE has outperformed COMT with an annualized return of 9.58%, while COMT has yielded a comparatively lower 8.33% annualized return.


KRE

1D
2.82%
1M
8.12%
6M
15.52%
YTD
21.63%
1Y
28.92%
3Y*
24.54%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
9.58%

COMT

1D
-0.49%
1M
2.53%
6M
26.18%
YTD
30.19%
1Y
33.20%
3Y*
12.71%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
8.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KRE vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KRE
SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF
21.63%10.21%18.58%-7.61%-15.08%39.29%-7.43%27.44%-18.81%7.49%
COMT
iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF
30.19%6.07%5.96%-6.56%19.45%36.88%-18.66%10.81%-6.67%11.70%

Correlation

The correlation between KRE and COMT is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2014

0.23

The correlation between KRE and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KRE vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KRE
KRE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
KRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
KRE Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
KRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
KRE Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

COMT
COMT Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KRE vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KRECOMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.27

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

1.90

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.06

6.35

-1.29

KRE vs. COMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KRE Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the COMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KRE and COMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KRE vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KRE drawdown since its inception was -68.54%, which is greater than COMT's maximum drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRE and COMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KRECOMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.54%

-51.89%

-16.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.95%

-17.57%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.20%

-17.57%

-10.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.69%

-29.00%

-23.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.92%

-39.22%

-15.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-11.28%

+11.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.78%

-23.95%

+2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.73%

5.24%

+0.49%

Volatility

KRE vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT) have volatilities of 5.76% and 5.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KRECOMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.76%

5.91%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.36%

19.67%

-3.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.95%

21.54%

+1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.73%

21.20%

+8.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.76%

18.85%

+12.91%

KRE vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

KRE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

KRE vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison

KRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than COMT's 5.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COMT
iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF
5.95%7.74%4.90%5.19%29.79%17.79%0.36%2.61%11.65%5.16%0.52%1.44%
KRE
SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF
2.05%2.45%2.59%2.99%2.51%1.97%2.78%2.21%2.48%1.40%1.40%1.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


KRE and COMT have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COMT has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to KRE (5.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRE dropped -68.54% vs COMT's -51.89%.

On 10-year performance, KRE leads with 9.58% vs 8.33% for COMT. On fees, KRE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, KRE has been the lower-risk option at 5.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, KRE has performed better with a 9.58% return vs 8.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KRE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for COMT.

COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.95%, compared with 2.05% for KRE.

KRE is categorized as Financials Equities, while COMT is Commodities. KRE tracks S&P Regional Banks Select Industry Index, while COMT tracks S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for KRE and 0.48% for COMT.

COMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KRE and COMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer