PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KRC vs. VTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KRC vs. VTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC) and Ventas, Inc. (VTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KRC achieves a 3.37% return, which is significantly lower than VTR's 3.55% return. Over the past 10 years, KRC has underperformed VTR with an annualized return of -0.64%, while VTR has yielded a comparatively higher 5.81% annualized return.


KRC

1D
2.32%
1M
8.57%
YTD
3.37%
6M
-3.11%
1Y
15.44%
3Y*
15.13%
5Y*
-7.32%
10Y*
-0.64%

VTR

1D
-2.93%
1M
-8.76%
YTD
3.55%
6M
-0.47%
1Y
28.55%
3Y*
24.27%
5Y*
10.32%
10Y*
5.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KRC vs. VTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KRC
Kilroy Realty Corporation
3.37%-2.00%7.81%10.09%-39.25%19.30%-29.18%36.76%-13.54%4.28%
VTR
Ventas, Inc.
3.55%35.09%22.24%15.06%-8.53%7.73%-9.80%3.42%3.45%0.71%

Correlation

The correlation between KRC and VTR is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 1998

0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between KRC and VTR has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

KRC:

$2.32

VTR:

$0.55

PE Ratio

KRC:

16.30

VTR:

144.46

PS Ratio

KRC:

4.05

VTR:

6.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

KRC:

$1.11B

VTR:

$6.13B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KRC:

$745.51M

VTR:

-$261.17M

EBITDA (TTM)

KRC:

$808.51M

VTR:

$2.45B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KRC vs. VTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KRC
KRC Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
KRC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KRC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
KRC Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
KRC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
KRC Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

VTR
VTR Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTR Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
VTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTR Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KRC vs. VTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC) and Ventas, Inc. (VTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KRCVTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.29

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.44

2.29

-1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.93

9.00

-8.07

KRC vs. VTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KRC Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the VTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KRC and VTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KRCVTRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

1.51

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.22

0.42

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

0.17

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.30

-0.11

Drawdowns

KRC vs. VTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KRC drawdown since its inception was -81.27%, roughly equal to the maximum VTR drawdown of -83.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRC and VTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KRCVTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.27%

-83.38%

+2.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.32%

-12.52%

-22.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.32%

-19.35%

-15.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.91%

-41.80%

-23.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.55%

-76.92%

+10.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.35%

-11.88%

-29.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.42%

-18.20%

-5.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.63%

3.18%

+13.45%

Volatility

KRC vs. VTR - Volatility Comparison

Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC) and Ventas, Inc. (VTR) have volatilities of 7.84% and 7.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KRCVTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.84%

7.93%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.38%

14.62%

+7.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.83%

19.04%

+8.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.96%

24.96%

+9.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.59%

34.77%

-3.18%

Dividends

KRC vs. VTR - Dividend Comparison

KRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, more than VTR's 2.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KRC
Kilroy Realty Corporation
5.70%5.78%5.34%5.42%5.48%3.07%3.43%2.28%2.85%2.21%4.61%2.21%
VTR
Ventas, Inc.
2.46%2.48%3.06%3.61%4.00%3.52%4.37%5.49%5.40%5.19%4.74%20.47%

Financials

KRC vs. VTR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kilroy Realty Corporation and Ventas, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
272.22M
1.66B
(KRC) Total Revenue
(VTR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KRC vs. VTR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kilroy Realty Corporation and Ventas, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
66.8%
39.6%
Portfolio components
KRC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kilroy Realty Corporation reported a gross profit of 181.91M and revenue of 272.22M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.8%.

VTR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ventas, Inc. reported a gross profit of 655.41M and revenue of 1.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.

KRC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kilroy Realty Corporation reported an operating income of 67.76M and revenue of 272.22M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.9%.

VTR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ventas, Inc. reported an operating income of 191.56M and revenue of 1.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.

KRC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kilroy Realty Corporation reported a net income of 12.42M and revenue of 272.22M, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.

VTR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ventas, Inc. reported a net income of 55.91M and revenue of 1.66B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KRC and VTR have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTR has higher volatility (7.93%) compared to KRC (7.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRC dropped -81.27% vs VTR's -83.38%.

VTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KRC and VTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer