PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KRC vs. CLILF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KRC vs. CLILF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC) and CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KRC achieves a 4.68% return, which is significantly lower than CLILF's 6.49% return.


KRC

1D
-0.85%
1M
11.67%
YTD
4.68%
6M
-1.93%
1Y
15.91%
3Y*
14.88%
5Y*
-7.27%
10Y*
-0.50%

CLILF

1D
0.00%
1M
-4.23%
YTD
6.49%
6M
33.67%
1Y
15.00%
3Y*
-5.11%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KRC vs. CLILF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
KRC
Kilroy Realty Corporation
4.68%-2.00%7.81%10.09%-39.25%-3.59%
CLILF
CapitaLand Investment Limited
6.49%-3.06%-1.09%-23.92%6.00%-1.96%

Correlation

The correlation between KRC and CLILF is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2021

-0.02

Fundamentals

EPS

KRC:

$2.32

CLILF:

SGD 0.05

PE Ratio

KRC:

16.51

CLILF:

52.17

PS Ratio

KRC:

4.10

CLILF:

3.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

KRC:

$1.11B

CLILF:

SGD 2.91B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KRC:

$745.51M

CLILF:

SGD 2.22B

EBITDA (TTM)

KRC:

$808.51M

CLILF:

SGD 153.89M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KRC vs. CLILF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KRC
KRC Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
KRC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KRC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
KRC Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
KRC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
KRC Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

CLILF
CLILF Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CLILF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLILF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLILF Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
CLILF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLILF Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KRC vs. CLILF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC) and CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KRCCLILFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.26

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

0.52

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.82

1.03

-0.21

KRC vs. CLILF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KRC Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is higher than the CLILF Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KRC and CLILF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KRC vs. CLILF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KRC drawdown since its inception was -81.27%, which is greater than CLILF's maximum drawdown of -66.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRC and CLILF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KRCCLILFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.27%

-66.07%

-15.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.32%

-29.26%

-6.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.32%

-45.96%

+10.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.61%

-53.74%

+13.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.42%

-44.07%

+20.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.67%

14.66%

+2.01%

Volatility

KRC vs. CLILF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC) is 7.59%, while CapitaLand Investment Limited (CLILF) has a volatility of 10.69%. This indicates that KRC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLILF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KRCCLILFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.59%

10.69%

-3.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.47%

54.59%

-32.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.82%

62.76%

-34.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.96%

79.89%

-45.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.59%

79.89%

-48.30%

Dividends

KRC vs. CLILF - Dividend Comparison

KRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.63%, more than CLILF's 3.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLILF
CapitaLand Investment Limited
3.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KRC
Kilroy Realty Corporation
5.63%5.78%5.34%5.42%5.48%3.07%3.43%2.28%2.85%2.21%4.61%2.21%

Financials

KRC vs. CLILF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kilroy Realty Corporation and CapitaLand Investment Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
272.22M
1.15B
(KRC) Total Revenue
(CLILF) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. KRC values in USD, CLILF values in SGD

KRC vs. CLILF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kilroy Realty Corporation and CapitaLand Investment Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
66.8%
39.6%
Portfolio components
KRC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kilroy Realty Corporation reported a gross profit of 181.91M and revenue of 272.22M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.8%.

CLILF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported a gross profit of 453.66M and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.

KRC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kilroy Realty Corporation reported an operating income of 67.76M and revenue of 272.22M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.9%.

CLILF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported an operating income of 325.76M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.

KRC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kilroy Realty Corporation reported a net income of 12.42M and revenue of 272.22M, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.

CLILF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CapitaLand Investment Limited reported a net income of -141.89M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of -12.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KRC and CLILF have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLILF has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to KRC (7.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRC dropped -81.27% vs CLILF's -66.07%.

KRC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KRC and CLILF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer