KR vs. QQQM
KR (The Kroger Co.) is a stock, while QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 5 years, KR returned 10.39%/yr vs 16.21%/yr for QQQM. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
KR vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KR achieves a -6.59% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 16.89% return.
KR
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- -10.50%
- YTD
- -6.59%
- 6M
- -7.25%
- 1Y
- -18.34%
- 3Y*
- 9.78%
- 5Y*
- 10.39%
- 10Y*
- 6.84%
QQQM
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -1.82%
- YTD
- 16.89%
- 6M
- 15.09%
- 1Y
- 33.06%
- 3Y*
- 26.84%
- 5Y*
- 16.21%
- 10Y*
- —
KR vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KR The Kroger Co. | -6.59% | 4.25% | 36.91% | 4.99% | 0.44% | 45.41% | -7.77% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 16.89% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between KR and QQQM is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020 | -0.04 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between KR and QQQM has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.04 to -0.39, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KR vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
KR
QQQM
KR vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Kroger Co. (KR) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KR | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.33 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | 2.78 | -3.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.71 | 10.21 | -11.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KR vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KR drawdown since its inception was -66.81%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KR and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KR | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.81% | -35.04% | -31.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.85% | -11.96% | -13.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.85% | -22.70% | -3.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.07% | -35.04% | +3.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.18% | -3.91% | -19.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.44% | -8.19% | -14.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.76% | 3.25% | +7.51% |
Volatility
KR vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
The Kroger Co. (KR) has a higher volatility of 11.48% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 8.84%. This indicates that KR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KR | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.48% | 8.84% | +2.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.20% | 14.40% | +7.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.39% | 17.79% | +9.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.14% | 22.54% | +4.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.11% | 22.29% | +6.82% |
Dividends
KR vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
KR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, more than QQQM's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KR The Kroger Co. | 2.42% | 2.14% | 2.00% | 2.41% | 2.11% | 1.72% | 2.14% | 2.07% | 1.93% | 1.79% | 1.30% | 0.94% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.44% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KR and QQQM have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KR has higher volatility (11.48%) compared to QQQM (8.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KR dropped -66.81% vs QQQM's -35.04%.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KR and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer