PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KR vs. MKC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KR vs. MKC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Kroger Co. (KR) and McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KR achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly higher than MKC's -29.48% return. Over the past 10 years, KR has outperformed MKC with an annualized return of 7.71%, while MKC has yielded a comparatively lower 1.49% annualized return.


KR

1D
-0.96%
1M
-3.58%
YTD
1.81%
6M
0.36%
1Y
-2.84%
3Y*
13.36%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*
7.71%

MKC

1D
0.78%
1M
-1.47%
YTD
-29.48%
6M
-23.94%
1Y
-33.99%
3Y*
-17.31%
5Y*
-9.65%
10Y*
1.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KR vs. MKC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KR
The Kroger Co.
1.81%4.25%36.91%4.99%0.44%45.41%11.90%7.90%2.08%-18.97%
MKC
McCormick & Company, Incorporated
-29.48%-8.33%13.97%-15.68%-12.65%2.67%14.70%23.65%39.01%11.34%

Correlation

The correlation between KR and MKC is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.22

Fundamentals

EPS

KR:

$1.20

MKC:

$6.10

PE Ratio

KR:

52.67

MKC:

7.80

PEG Ratio

KR:

7.64

MKC:

5.67

PS Ratio

KR:

0.28

MKC:

1.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

KR:

$147.23B

MKC:

$7.11B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KR:

$33.42B

MKC:

$2.70B

EBITDA (TTM)

KR:

$5.29B

MKC:

$1.22B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KR vs. MKC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KR
KR Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
KR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
KR Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
KR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
KR Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

MKC
MKC Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
MKC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MKC Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
MKC Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
MKC Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
MKC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KR vs. MKC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Kroger Co. (KR) and McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KRMKCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.80

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.15

-0.86

+0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.29

-1.75

+1.47

KR vs. MKC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KR Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is higher than the MKC Sharpe Ratio of -1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KR and MKC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KRMKCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

-1.22

+1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

-0.40

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.06

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.43

-0.07

Drawdowns

KR vs. MKC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KR drawdown since its inception was -66.81%, which is greater than MKC's maximum drawdown of -52.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KR and MKC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KRMKCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.81%

-52.02%

-14.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.44%

-39.50%

+20.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

-47.65%

+28.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.07%

-52.02%

+20.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.25%

-52.02%

+5.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.28%

-49.90%

+33.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.44%

-11.01%

-11.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.96%

19.43%

-9.47%

Volatility

KR vs. MKC - Volatility Comparison

The Kroger Co. (KR) has a higher volatility of 9.14% compared to McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) at 6.70%. This indicates that KR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MKC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KRMKCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.14%

6.70%

+2.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.12%

23.08%

-2.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.52%

27.96%

-0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.86%

24.30%

+2.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.95%

24.16%

+4.79%

Dividends

KR vs. MKC - Dividend Comparison

KR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than MKC's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KR
The Kroger Co.
2.22%2.14%2.00%2.41%2.11%1.72%2.14%2.07%1.93%1.79%1.30%0.94%
MKC
McCormick & Company, Incorporated
3.91%2.69%2.24%2.32%1.81%1.44%1.68%1.37%1.53%1.89%1.89%1.91%

Financials

KR vs. MKC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Kroger Co. and McCormick & Company, Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
33.86B
1.87B
(KR) Total Revenue
(MKC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KR vs. MKC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Kroger Co. and McCormick & Company, Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
21.0%
37.8%
Portfolio components
KR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Kroger Co. reported a gross profit of 7.12B and revenue of 33.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.0%.

MKC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported a gross profit of 708.90M and revenue of 1.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.8%.

KR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Kroger Co. reported an operating income of -1.54B and revenue of 33.86B, resulting in an operating margin of -4.6%.

MKC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported an operating income of 227.50M and revenue of 1.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.1%.

KR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Kroger Co. reported a net income of -1.32B and revenue of 33.86B, resulting in a net margin of -3.9%.

MKC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 1.87B, resulting in a net margin of 54.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KR and MKC have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KR has higher volatility (9.14%) compared to MKC (6.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KR dropped -66.81% vs MKC's -52.02%.

KR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.10 vs -1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KR and MKC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer