KPRO vs. KTEC
KPRO (KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF) and KTEC (KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KPRO is a Options Trading fund actively managed by KraneShares, while KTEC is a China Equities fund tracking the Hang Seng Tech Index. KPRO is actively managed, while KTEC is passively managed. Over the past year, KPRO returned -5.14% vs -21.94% for KTEC. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KPRO charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for KTEC.
Performance
KPRO vs. KTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KPRO achieves a -6.26% return, which is significantly higher than KTEC's -21.65% return.
KPRO
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- YTD
- -6.26%
- 6M
- -11.97%
- 1Y
- -5.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KTEC
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -8.23%
- YTD
- -21.65%
- 6M
- -22.39%
- 1Y
- -21.94%
- 3Y*
- 3.03%
- 5Y*
- -13.12%
- 10Y*
- —
KPRO vs. KTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
KPRO KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF | -6.26% | 7.79% | 11.98% |
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF | -21.65% | 21.01% | 36.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between KPRO and KTEC is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2024 | 0.83 |
The correlation between KPRO and KTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KPRO vs. KTEC — Risk / Return Rank
KPRO
KTEC
KPRO vs. KTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO) and KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KPRO | KTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 0.88 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | -0.63 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.77 | -1.23 | +0.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KPRO vs. KTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KPRO drawdown since its inception was -12.98%, smaller than the maximum KTEC drawdown of -66.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KPRO and KTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KPRO | KTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.98% | -66.90% | +53.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.98% | -35.03% | +22.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -66.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.98% | -50.55% | +37.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.63% | -43.97% | +41.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.68% | 17.81% | -11.13% |
Volatility
KPRO vs. KTEC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO) is 1.48%, while KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) has a volatility of 8.17%. This indicates that KPRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KPRO | KTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.48% | 8.17% | -6.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.82% | 20.84% | -13.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.83% | 27.82% | -18.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.77% | 43.21% | -35.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.77% | 43.03% | -35.26% |
KPRO vs. KTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
KPRO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than KTEC's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
KPRO vs. KTEC - Dividend Comparison
KPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than KTEC's 4.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KPRO KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF | 2.83% | 2.65% | 3.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF | 4.28% | 3.36% | 0.27% | 0.81% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KPRO and KTEC have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KTEC has higher volatility (8.17%) compared to KPRO (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KPRO dropped -12.98% vs KTEC's -66.90%.
On 1-year performance, KPRO leads with -5.14% vs -21.94% for KTEC. On fees, KTEC is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, KPRO has been the lower-risk option at 1.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, KPRO has performed better with a -5.14% return vs -21.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KTEC is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for KPRO.
KTEC has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 2.83% for KPRO.
KPRO is categorized as Options Trading, while KTEC is China Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for KPRO and 0.69% for KTEC.
KPRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.59 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KPRO and KTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer