KPRO vs. GMAR

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

KPRO (KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF) and GMAR (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, KPRO returned -3.39% vs 13.41% for GMAR. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KPRO charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for GMAR.

Performance

KPRO vs. GMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KPRO achieves a -4.41% return, which is significantly lower than GMAR's 8.48% return.

KPRO

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 1.14%
• 6M: -5.56%
• YTD: -4.41%
• 1Y: -3.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GMAR

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 0.36%
• 6M: 8.19%
• YTD: 8.48%
• 1Y: 13.41%
• 3Y*: 11.51%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KPRO vs. GMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KPRO KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF	-4.41%	7.79%	11.98%
GMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March	8.48%	9.29%	10.86%

Correlation

The correlation between KPRO and GMAR is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2024	0.32

Return for Risk

KPRO vs. GMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KPRO

KPRO Risk / Return Rank: 6
KPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
KPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
KPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 5
KPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
KPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7

GMAR

GMAR Risk / Return Rank: 97
GMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
GMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
GMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 97
GMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
GMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KPRO vs. GMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KPRO	GMAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.39	3.46	-3.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.41	5.72	-6.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.86	-0.93
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.26	7.50	-7.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.46	47.48	-47.94

KPRO vs. GMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KPRO Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is lower than the GMAR Sharpe Ratio of 3.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KPRO and GMAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KPRO vs. GMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KPRO drawdown since its inception was -13.34%, which is greater than GMAR's maximum drawdown of -9.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KPRO and GMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	KPRO	GMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.34%	-9.11%	-4.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.34%	-1.79%	-11.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.26%	-0.18%	-11.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.87%	-0.53%	-2.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.32%	0.28%	+7.04%

Volatility

KPRO vs. GMAR - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO) has a higher volatility of 1.34% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR) at 1.06%. This indicates that KPRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KPRO	GMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.34%	1.06%	+0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.66%	3.31%	+1.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.85%	3.90%	+4.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.70%	6.77%	+0.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.70%	6.77%	+0.93%

KPRO vs. GMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

KPRO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GMAR's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

KPRO vs. GMAR - Dividend Comparison

KPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, while GMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KPRO KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF	2.77%	2.65%	3.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KPRO and GMAR in my portfolio?

KPRO and GMAR have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KPRO or GMAR?

KPRO has higher volatility (1.34%) compared to GMAR (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KPRO dropped -13.34% vs GMAR's -9.11%.

Which ETF is better, KPRO or GMAR?

On 1-year performance, GMAR leads with 13.41% vs -3.39% for KPRO. On fees, GMAR is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, GMAR has been the lower-risk option at 1.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KPRO or GMAR?

Over the 1-year period, GMAR has performed better with a 13.41% return vs -3.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KPRO or GMAR?

GMAR is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for KPRO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KPRO or GMAR?

KPRO has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 0.00% for GMAR.

What is the main difference between KPRO and GMAR?

They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for KPRO and 0.85% for GMAR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.46 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.