KPHO vs. EMXC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KPHO (KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF) and EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - KPHO tracks the Dragon Capital Merqube Vietnam Growth Index while EMXC tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KPHO charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EMXC.

Performance

KPHO vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF (KPHO) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KPHO achieves a -6.83% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 41.72% return.

KPHO

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -2.98%
• YTD: -6.83%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMXC

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: 12.61%
• YTD: 41.72%
• 6M: 46.94%
• 1Y: 77.94%
• 3Y*: 29.08%
• 5Y*: 12.76%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KPHO vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KPHO KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF	-6.83%	9.78%
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	41.72%	3.72%

Correlation

The correlation between KPHO and EMXC is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2025	0.51

Return for Risk

KPHO vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMXC

EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 91
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 92
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KPHO vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF (KPHO) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KPHO	EMXC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.61	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	0.55	-0.38

Drawdowns

KPHO vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KPHO drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, smaller than the maximum EMXC drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KPHO and EMXC.

Drawdown Indicators

	KPHO	EMXC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.34%	-42.81%	+28.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.41%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.12%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.98%	-1.00%	-10.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.83%	-10.19%	+4.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.56%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KPHO	EMXC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.88%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	19.34%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.80%	21.70%	+7.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.80%	17.45%	+11.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.80%	19.82%	+8.98%

KPHO vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

KPHO has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

KPHO vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison

KPHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.16%, more than EMXC's 1.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	1.99%	2.82%	2.69%	1.83%	2.85%	1.78%	1.45%	3.25%	2.63%	0.99%
KPHO KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF	11.16%	10.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KPHO and EMXC in my portfolio?

KPHO and EMXC have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KPHO or EMXC?

On fees, EMXC is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KPHO or EMXC?

EMXC is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for KPHO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KPHO or EMXC?

KPHO has the higher dividend yield at 11.16%, compared with 1.99% for EMXC.

What is the main difference between KPHO and EMXC?

KPHO tracks Dragon Capital Merqube Vietnam Growth Index, while EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for KPHO and 0.49% for EMXC.