KORU vs. LULG
KORU (Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares) and LULG (Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KORU is a South Korea Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea 25/50 Index, while LULG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. KORU is passively managed, while LULG is actively managed. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KORU charges 1.32%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for LULG.
Performance
KORU vs. LULG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KORU achieves a 101.15% return, which is significantly higher than LULG's -73.00% return.
KORU
- 1D
- -2.09%
- 1M
- -60.06%
- 6M
- 33.41%
- YTD
- 101.15%
- 1Y
- 339.17%
- 3Y*
- 52.96%
- 5Y*
- -0.60%
- 10Y*
- 5.03%
LULG
- 1D
- 2.42%
- 1M
- 2.69%
- 6M
- -72.06%
- YTD
- -73.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KORU vs. LULG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KORU Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares | 101.15% | 6.65% |
LULG Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF | -73.00% | 55.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between KORU and LULG is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KORU vs. LULG — Risk / Return Rank
KORU
LULG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KORU vs. LULG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF (LULG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KORU | LULG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.80 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.47 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KORU vs. LULG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KORU drawdown since its inception was -95.79%, which is greater than LULG's maximum drawdown of -79.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KORU and LULG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KORU | LULG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.79% | -79.88% | -15.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -73.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.13% | -74.99% | +3.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.40% | -40.32% | -17.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.32% | — | — |
Volatility
KORU vs. LULG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KORU | LULG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 70.54% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 147.46% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 151.65% | 86.92% | +64.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.00% | 86.92% | +7.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 84.35% | 86.92% | -2.57% |
KORU vs. LULG - Expense Ratio Comparison
KORU has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than LULG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
KORU vs. LULG - Dividend Comparison
KORU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, while LULG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KORU Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares | 0.43% | 0.89% | 4.10% | 2.55% | 0.48% | 0.76% | 0.01% | 0.93% | 1.40% | 3.59% |
LULG Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KORU and LULG have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LULG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LULG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.32% for KORU.
KORU has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.00% for LULG.
KORU is categorized as South Korea Equities, while LULG is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.32% for KORU and 0.75% for LULG.
Find the right allocation for KORU and LULG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer