PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KOOL vs. SUPP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KOOL vs. SUPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in North Shore Equity Rotation ETF (KOOL) and TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF (SUPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KOOL achieves a 13.81% return, which is significantly lower than SUPP's 20.33% return.


KOOL

1D
0.44%
1M
1.06%
6M
11.62%
YTD
13.81%
1Y
22.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SUPP

1D
0.29%
1M
-0.05%
6M
15.92%
YTD
20.33%
1Y
23.05%
3Y*
16.95%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KOOL vs. SUPP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
KOOL
North Shore Equity Rotation ETF
13.81%16.05%10.83%
SUPP
TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF
20.33%11.65%-4.05%

Correlation

The correlation between KOOL and SUPP is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

0.82

The correlation between KOOL and SUPP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

KOOL vs. SUPP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KOOL
SUPP

Financial Services

27.9%

-

Technology

17.5%
37.0%

Energy

11.7%

-

Industrials

8.5%
52.4%

Utilities

7.4%

-

Communication Services

7.0%

-

Basic Materials

6.1%
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

4.3%
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%

-

Healthcare

2.7%

-

Real Estate

2.4%

-

Financial Services

KOOL
27.9%
SUPP

-

Technology

KOOL
17.5%
SUPP
37.0%

Energy

KOOL
11.7%
SUPP

-

Industrials

KOOL
8.5%
SUPP
52.4%

Utilities

KOOL
7.4%
SUPP

-

Communication Services

KOOL
7.0%
SUPP

-

Basic Materials

KOOL
6.1%
SUPP
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

KOOL
4.3%
SUPP
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

KOOL
3.0%
SUPP

-

Healthcare

KOOL
2.7%
SUPP

-

Real Estate

KOOL
2.4%
SUPP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KOOL vs. SUPP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KOOL
KOOL Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
KOOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KOOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
KOOL Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
KOOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
KOOL Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

SUPP
SUPP Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SUPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUPP Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SUPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUPP Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KOOL vs. SUPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North Shore Equity Rotation ETF (KOOL) and TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF (SUPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KOOLSUPPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.20

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

1.73

+1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.70

6.76

+3.94

KOOL vs. SUPP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KOOL Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the SUPP Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KOOL and SUPP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KOOL vs. SUPP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KOOL drawdown since its inception was -20.46%, smaller than the maximum SUPP drawdown of -25.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOOL and SUPP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KOOLSUPPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.46%

-25.03%

+4.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.18%

-13.59%

+6.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.20%

-5.15%

+2.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.55%

-4.36%

+1.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

3.47%

-1.42%

Volatility

KOOL vs. SUPP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for North Shore Equity Rotation ETF (KOOL) is 4.46%, while TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF (SUPP) has a volatility of 10.46%. This indicates that KOOL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SUPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KOOLSUPPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

10.46%

-6.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.23%

19.15%

-7.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.67%

21.93%

-8.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.96%

20.06%

-3.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.96%

20.06%

-3.10%

KOOL vs. SUPP - Expense Ratio Comparison

KOOL has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than SUPP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

KOOL vs. SUPP - Dividend Comparison

KOOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, more than SUPP's 0.29% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
KOOL
North Shore Equity Rotation ETF
0.43%0.37%0.56%0.00%
SUPP
TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF
0.29%0.35%0.49%0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


KOOL and SUPP have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SUPP has higher volatility (10.46%) compared to KOOL (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KOOL dropped -20.46% vs SUPP's -25.03%.

On 1-year performance, SUPP leads with 23.05% vs 22.57% for KOOL. On fees, SUPP is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, KOOL has been the lower-risk option at 4.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SUPP has performed better with a 23.05% return vs 22.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SUPP is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for KOOL.

KOOL has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.29% for SUPP.

They also come from different issuers: North Shore and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for KOOL and 0.75% for SUPP.

KOOL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KOOL and SUPP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer