KOOL vs. DJUN
KOOL (North Shore Equity Rotation ETF) and DJUN (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. KOOL is actively managed, while DJUN is passively managed. Over the past year, KOOL returned 28.04% vs 11.14% for DJUN. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KOOL charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DJUN.
Performance
KOOL vs. DJUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KOOL achieves a 13.81% return, which is significantly higher than DJUN's 3.90% return.
KOOL
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -0.72%
- YTD
- 13.81%
- 6M
- 13.28%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DJUN
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 3.90%
- 6M
- 3.92%
- 1Y
- 11.14%
- 3Y*
- 11.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.02%
- 10Y*
- —
KOOL vs. DJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
KOOL North Shore Equity Rotation ETF | 13.81% | 16.05% | 10.83% |
DJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June | 3.90% | 9.38% | 8.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between KOOL and DJUN is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024 | 0.83 |
The correlation between KOOL and DJUN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KOOL vs. DJUN — Risk / Return Rank
KOOL
DJUN
KOOL vs. DJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North Shore Equity Rotation ETF (KOOL) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KOOL | DJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.59 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.92 | 3.58 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.88 | 22.05 | -7.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KOOL vs. DJUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KOOL drawdown since its inception was -20.46%, which is greater than DJUN's maximum drawdown of -11.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOOL and DJUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KOOL | DJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.46% | -11.96% | -8.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.18% | -3.15% | -4.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -11.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.20% | -0.12% | -2.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.52% | -1.58% | -0.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 0.51% | +1.38% |
Volatility
KOOL vs. DJUN - Volatility Comparison
North Shore Equity Rotation ETF (KOOL) has a higher volatility of 5.11% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN) at 0.28%. This indicates that KOOL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DJUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KOOL | DJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.11% | 0.28% | +4.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.06% | 3.54% | +7.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.62% | 4.47% | +9.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.06% | 8.51% | +8.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.06% | 8.02% | +9.04% |
KOOL vs. DJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
KOOL has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than DJUN's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
KOOL vs. DJUN - Dividend Comparison
KOOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, while DJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KOOL North Shore Equity Rotation ETF | 0.35% | 0.37% | 0.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KOOL and DJUN have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KOOL has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to DJUN (0.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KOOL dropped -20.46% vs DJUN's -11.96%.
On 1-year performance, KOOL leads with 28.04% vs 11.14% for DJUN. On fees, DJUN is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, DJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, KOOL has performed better with a 28.04% return vs 11.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DJUN is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for KOOL.
KOOL has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.00% for DJUN.
They also come from different issuers: North Shore and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for KOOL and 0.85% for DJUN.
DJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KOOL and DJUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer