KOMP vs. QMID

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

KOMP (SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF) and QMID (WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - KOMP tracks the S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index while QMID tracks the WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, KOMP returned 30.32% vs 8.61% for QMID. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KOMP charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for QMID.

Performance

KOMP vs. QMID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) and WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KOMP achieves a 14.25% return, which is significantly higher than QMID's 2.17% return.

KOMP

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: -3.38%
• YTD: 14.25%
• 6M: 11.15%
• 1Y: 30.32%
• 3Y*: 18.25%
• 5Y*: 1.68%
• 10Y*: —

QMID

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: 1.66%
• YTD: 2.17%
• 6M: -0.27%
• 1Y: 8.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KOMP vs. QMID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KOMP SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF	14.25%	19.74%	17.04%
QMID WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund	2.17%	5.02%	9.01%

Correlation

The correlation between KOMP and QMID is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024	0.83

The correlation between KOMP and QMID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

KOMP vs. QMID - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KOMP	QMID
Technology	35.5%	15.8%
Industrials	27.7%	25.0%
Healthcare	11.1%	14.1%
Financial Services	6.2%	12.0%
Communication Services	5.3%	3.2%
Utilities	4.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	4.3%	15.9%
Basic Materials	2.5%	2.2%
Energy	2.4%	3.2%
Consumer Defensive	0.2%	7.5%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

KOMP vs. QMID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KOMP

KOMP Risk / Return Rank: 39
KOMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
KOMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
KOMP Omega Ratio Rank: 35
KOMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
KOMP Martin Ratio Rank: 41

QMID

QMID Risk / Return Rank: 19
QMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
QMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
QMID Omega Ratio Rank: 17
QMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
QMID Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KOMP vs. QMID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) and WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KOMP	QMID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	0.57	+0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	0.93	+0.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.10	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.96	0.81	+1.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.05	2.73	+3.32

KOMP vs. QMID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KOMP Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is higher than the QMID Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KOMP and QMID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KOMP vs. QMID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KOMP drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, which is greater than QMID's maximum drawdown of -24.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOMP and QMID.

Drawdown Indicators

	KOMP	QMID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.06%	-24.42%	-25.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.50%	-10.67%	-4.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.93%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.46%	-2.05%	-7.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.57%	-5.40%	-16.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.03%	3.16%	+1.87%

Volatility

KOMP vs. QMID - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) has a higher volatility of 10.58% compared to WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) at 3.99%. This indicates that KOMP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QMID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KOMP	QMID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.58%	3.99%	+6.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.78%	10.79%	+8.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.74%	15.16%	+9.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.09%	18.43%	+6.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.13%	18.43%	+8.70%

KOMP vs. QMID - Expense Ratio Comparison

KOMP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QMID's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

KOMP vs. QMID - Dividend Comparison

KOMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than QMID's 0.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
KOMP SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF	1.53%	1.84%	1.04%	1.27%	1.47%	1.44%	0.69%	0.81%	0.13%
QMID WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund	0.50%	0.51%	1.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KOMP and QMID in my portfolio?

KOMP and QMID have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KOMP or QMID?

KOMP has higher volatility (10.58%) compared to QMID (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KOMP dropped -50.06% vs QMID's -24.42%.

Which ETF is better, KOMP or QMID?

On 1-year performance, KOMP leads with 30.32% vs 8.61% for QMID. On fees, KOMP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, QMID has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KOMP or QMID?

Over the 1-year period, KOMP has performed better with a 30.32% return vs 8.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KOMP or QMID?

KOMP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for QMID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KOMP or QMID?

KOMP has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.50% for QMID.

What is the main difference between KOMP and QMID?

KOMP tracks S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index, while QMID tracks WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for KOMP and 0.38% for QMID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KOMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.