KOMP vs. CHPS
KOMP (State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KOMP is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, KOMP returned 13.12%/yr vs 49.43%/yr for CHPS. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. KOMP charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.
Performance
KOMP vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KOMP achieves a 10.19% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 70.98% return.
KOMP
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -5.47%
- 6M
- 4.36%
- YTD
- 10.19%
- 1Y
- 21.97%
- 3Y*
- 13.12%
- 5Y*
- 2.00%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.11%
CHPS
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -11.74%
- 6M
- 41.98%
- YTD
- 70.98%
- 1Y
- 141.43%
- 3Y*
- 49.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 46.83%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.66M | $2.47M | $3.90M | |
| $3.68M | $4.72M | $6.88M |
KOMP vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
KOMP State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF | 10.19% | 19.74% | 10.05% | 0.55% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 70.98% | 58.47% | 7.75% | 10.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between KOMP and CHPS is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023 | 0.70 |
The correlation between KOMP and CHPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
KOMP vs. CHPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KOMP
CHPS
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
KOMP
CHPS
Industrials
KOMP
CHPS
Healthcare
KOMP
CHPS
-
Consumer Cyclical
KOMP
CHPS
Communication Services
KOMP
CHPS
Financial Services
KOMP
CHPS
Utilities
KOMP
CHPS
-
Basic Materials
KOMP
CHPS
-
Energy
KOMP
CHPS
Consumer Defensive
KOMP
CHPS
Real Estate
KOMP
-
CHPS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KOMP vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank
KOMP
CHPS
KOMP vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KOMP | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.44 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | 4.35 | -3.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.28 | 18.16 | -14.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KOMP vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KOMP drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, which is greater than CHPS's maximum drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOMP and CHPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KOMP | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.06% | -39.44% | -10.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.57% | -32.74% | +17.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.93% | -39.44% | +14.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.68% | -24.91% | +12.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.42% | -9.38% | -12.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.01% | 7.82% | -1.81% |
Volatility
KOMP vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) is 7.89%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 19.17%. This indicates that KOMP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KOMP | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.89% | 19.17% | -11.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.56% | 40.21% | -19.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.79% | 45.64% | -19.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.22% | 37.27% | -12.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.12% | 37.27% | -10.15% |
KOMP vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
KOMP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
KOMP vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison
KOMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than CHPS's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 0.38% | 0.68% | 1.75% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KOMP State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF | 1.58% | 1.84% | 1.04% | 1.27% | 1.47% | 1.44% | 0.69% | 0.81% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KOMP and CHPS have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHPS has higher volatility (19.17%) compared to KOMP (7.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KOMP dropped -50.06% vs CHPS's -39.44%.
On 3-year performance, CHPS leads with 49.43% vs 13.12% for KOMP. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, KOMP has been the lower-risk option at 7.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 49.43% return vs 13.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for KOMP.
KOMP has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.38% for CHPS.
KOMP is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. KOMP tracks S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for KOMP and 0.15% for CHPS.
CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KOMP and CHPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer