PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KOMP vs. CHPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KOMP vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KOMP achieves a 10.19% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 70.98% return.


KOMP

1D
-0.09%
1M
-5.47%
6M
4.36%
YTD
10.19%
1Y
21.97%
3Y*
13.12%
5Y*
2.00%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.11%

CHPS

1D
1.47%
1M
-11.74%
6M
41.98%
YTD
70.98%
1Y
141.43%
3Y*
49.43%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
46.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.66M$2.47M$3.90M
$3.68M$4.72M$6.88M

KOMP vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
KOMP
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF
10.19%19.74%10.05%0.55%
CHPS
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF
70.98%58.47%7.75%10.88%

Correlation

The correlation between KOMP and CHPS is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023

0.70

The correlation between KOMP and CHPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

KOMP vs. CHPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KOMP
CHPS

Technology

38.9%
99.6%

Industrials

25.7%
0.4%

Healthcare

12.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
0.0%

Communication Services

4.2%
0.0%

Financial Services

4.0%
0.2%

Utilities

3.6%

-

Basic Materials

3.0%

-

Energy

1.3%
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

0.5%
0.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

KOMP
38.9%
CHPS
99.6%

Industrials

KOMP
25.7%
CHPS
0.4%

Healthcare

KOMP
12.9%
CHPS

-

Consumer Cyclical

KOMP
6.0%
CHPS
0.0%

Communication Services

KOMP
4.2%
CHPS
0.0%

Financial Services

KOMP
4.0%
CHPS
0.2%

Utilities

KOMP
3.6%
CHPS

-

Basic Materials

KOMP
3.0%
CHPS

-

Energy

KOMP
1.3%
CHPS
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

KOMP
0.5%
CHPS
0.0%

Real Estate

KOMP

-

CHPS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KOMP vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KOMP
KOMP Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
KOMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KOMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
KOMP Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
KOMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
KOMP Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

CHPS
CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KOMP vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KOMPCHPSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.44

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

4.35

-3.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.28

18.16

-14.88

KOMP vs. CHPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KOMP Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the CHPS Sharpe Ratio of 3.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KOMP and CHPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KOMP vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KOMP drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, which is greater than CHPS's maximum drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOMP and CHPS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KOMPCHPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.06%

-39.44%

-10.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.57%

-32.74%

+17.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.93%

-39.44%

+14.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.68%

-24.91%

+12.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.42%

-9.38%

-12.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.01%

7.82%

-1.81%

Volatility

KOMP vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) is 7.89%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 19.17%. This indicates that KOMP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KOMPCHPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.89%

19.17%

-11.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.56%

40.21%

-19.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.79%

45.64%

-19.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.22%

37.27%

-12.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.12%

37.27%

-10.15%

KOMP vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

KOMP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

KOMP vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

KOMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than CHPS's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CHPS
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF
0.38%0.68%1.75%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KOMP
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF
1.58%1.84%1.04%1.27%1.47%1.44%0.69%0.81%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


KOMP and CHPS have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHPS has higher volatility (19.17%) compared to KOMP (7.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KOMP dropped -50.06% vs CHPS's -39.44%.

On 3-year performance, CHPS leads with 49.43% vs 13.12% for KOMP. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, KOMP has been the lower-risk option at 7.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 49.43% return vs 13.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for KOMP.

KOMP has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.38% for CHPS.

KOMP is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. KOMP tracks S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for KOMP and 0.15% for CHPS.

CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KOMP and CHPS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer