PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KOKU vs. TOK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KOKU vs. TOK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF (KOKU) and iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF (TOK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with KOKU having a 7.33% return and TOK slightly higher at 7.65%.


KOKU

1D
-2.72%
1M
-0.32%
YTD
7.33%
6M
7.81%
1Y
23.41%
3Y*
20.15%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*

TOK

1D
-2.48%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
7.65%
6M
8.12%
1Y
23.58%
3Y*
20.17%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
13.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KOKU vs. TOK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
KOKU
Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF
7.33%21.45%19.45%24.23%-17.83%23.84%40.42%
TOK
iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF
7.65%20.83%19.52%24.76%-17.93%23.84%40.63%

Correlation

The correlation between KOKU and TOK is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2020

0.95

The correlation between KOKU and TOK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

KOKU vs. TOK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KOKU
TOK

Technology

28.9%
31.3%

Financial Services

15.6%
14.9%

Industrials

10.5%
9.8%

Communication Services

9.3%
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
9.0%

Healthcare

8.9%
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
5.2%

Energy

4.4%
4.0%

Basic Materials

3.3%
3.2%

Utilities

2.8%
2.8%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.7%

Technology

KOKU
28.9%
TOK
31.3%

Financial Services

KOKU
15.6%
TOK
14.9%

Industrials

KOKU
10.5%
TOK
9.8%

Communication Services

KOKU
9.3%
TOK
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

KOKU
9.1%
TOK
9.0%

Healthcare

KOKU
8.9%
TOK
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

KOKU
5.4%
TOK
5.2%

Energy

KOKU
4.4%
TOK
4.0%

Basic Materials

KOKU
3.3%
TOK
3.2%

Utilities

KOKU
2.8%
TOK
2.8%

Real Estate

KOKU
1.8%
TOK
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KOKU vs. TOK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KOKU
KOKU Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
KOKU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KOKU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
KOKU Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
KOKU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
KOKU Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

TOK
TOK Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
TOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOK Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
TOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOK Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KOKU vs. TOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF (KOKU) and iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF (TOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KOKUTOKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.35

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

2.61

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.67

11.95

-0.27

KOKU vs. TOK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KOKU Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the TOK Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KOKU and TOK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KOKUTOKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

1.94

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.74

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

0.43

+0.64

Drawdowns

KOKU vs. TOK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KOKU drawdown since its inception was -25.77%, smaller than the maximum TOK drawdown of -56.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOKU and TOK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KOKUTOKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.77%

-56.18%

+30.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.04%

-9.07%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.73%

-16.23%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.77%

-25.86%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.95%

-2.70%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-8.52%

+3.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

1.98%

+0.03%

Volatility

KOKU vs. TOK - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF (KOKU) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF (TOK) at 3.82%. This indicates that KOKU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KOKUTOKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.06%

3.82%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.84%

9.72%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.49%

12.22%

+0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.45%

15.96%

+0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.84%

17.16%

-0.32%

KOKU vs. TOK - Expense Ratio Comparison

KOKU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than TOK's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

KOKU vs. TOK - Dividend Comparison

KOKU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, more than TOK's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KOKU
Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF
1.39%1.48%1.63%1.76%1.98%1.89%0.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TOK
iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF
1.28%1.37%1.66%1.95%3.55%1.66%1.52%2.12%2.74%2.60%2.56%3.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, KOKU and TOK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

KOKU has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to TOK (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KOKU dropped -25.77% vs TOK's -56.18%.

On 5-year performance, TOK leads with 11.75% vs 11.69% for KOKU. On fees, KOKU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, TOK has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TOK has performed better with a 11.75% return vs 11.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KOKU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for TOK.

KOKU has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 1.28% for TOK.

KOKU tracks MSCI Kokusai Index (World ex Japan), while TOK tracks MSCI Kokusai Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for KOKU and 0.25% for TOK.

TOK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KOKU and TOK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer